City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

City say the rules are null and void. Why are they not?

s.2(4) of the Competition Act - the decision to bring in the rules was unlawful, therefore prohibited, therefore void.
Yes, City say that is their position. But the PL's position is clearly the opposite. My view is either the Tribunal will find a way to get to say everything pre 2024 are binding or the teams will easily pass a regime equivalent to the original APT at the first opportunity.
 
No 2 separate points. 2024 amendments, will go. Shareholder loans going forward will be FMVed for market interest rates.

Will that be for loans now clubs have or they going to put in the rules that only loans from say November 1st are FMVed?
 
Will that be for loans now clubs have or they going to put in the rules that only loans from say November 1st are FMVed?
Nobody knows - I suspect for the 25/26 calculation is most likely by way of some transitional allowance
 
No fan of Panja but that's a bit of a cheap shot bearing in mind @slbsn himself was saying the judgment was a score draw or a slight City win until recently.

Have to own up when you get something wrong. I do it all the time :)
You've completely missed the point - well done
 
No fan of Panja but that's a bit of a cheap shot bearing in mind @slbsn himself was saying the judgment was a score draw or a slight City win until recently.

Have to own up when you get something wrong. I do it all the time :)
cheap shot : an act of deliberate roughness against a defenseless opponent

I had to double take there, you serious?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.