You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
The PL seem intent on going ahead with the vote - despite warnings that the amendments are still unlawful. Beginning to think they have reason to proceed which doesn’t bode well for us.
Think this is going to go legal again.
I have the same slight concern.....
I hope I'm wrong....
blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 29,477
Not necessarily, if they vote it through on Friday then next week the Tribunal report back with their clarifications and the new rules are obviously still illegal,then the P/L will have no choice but to void the vote.The vote can still be pulled Thursday if it doesn't it means they've bribed them enough to get it through then it's back to court or whatever city did last time
I’d have thought anyway.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
They are proceeding because they haven't got a clue what they are doing.The PL seem intent on going ahead with the vote - despite warnings that the amendments are still unlawful. Beginning to think they have reason to proceed which doesn’t bode well for us.
Think this is going to go legal again.
We won the case but the same evening they came out and said it was only minor tweaks that needed doing and that the rules will still stand.
Now we have these jokers still not done a scoobies about anything?
Why? Because they are at war with us, albeit through the red cartels guidance.
Minor? Where have I heard that?
Oh yeah, the rags lost more over a three year period than Everton and Forest but the Premier League said it was a minor offence.
This is the kind of delusional, fucked up shite we've had to put up with.
Not for long though mark my words....
I really hope we take them apart. I don’t care anymore about the PL games. I just want them taken downThey are proceeding because they haven't got a clue what they are doing.
We won the case but the same evening they came out and said it was only minor tweaks that needed doing and that the rules will still stand.
Now we have these jokers still not done a scoobies about anything?
Why? Because they are at war with us, albeit through the red cartels guidance.
Minor? Where have I heard that?
Oh yeah, the rags lost more over a three year period than Everton and Forest but the Premier League said it was a minor offence.
This is the kind of delusional, fucked up shite we've had to put up with.
Not for long though mark my words....
cityontheup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 1,124
More likely to be drawing a deer with a man with a spear hunting itI reckon Keown wasn’t writing at all…probably doodling little drawings of space aliens and flying saucers.
johnnytapia
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Feb 2012
- Messages
- 10,596
The bottom line is Sam Wallace has a 3 inch penis and should be roundly ignored.
Of course I won't laugh," said the nurse. "I'm a professional. In over twenty years I've never laughed at a patient."
"Okay then," said Bob, as he proceeded to drop his trousers, revealing the smallest male part the nurse had ever seen. The length and width were almost identical to a AAA battery.
Unable to control herself, the nurse tried to stop a giggle, but it just came out. Feeling very bad that she had laughed at the man's part, she composed herself as well as she could. "I am so sorry," she said... "I don't know what came over me. On my honour as a nurse and a lady, I promise that won't happen again. Now, tell me, what seems to be the problem?"
"It's swollen," Bob replied.
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,651
We all have to put food on the table and I'm sure that people would point to my own situation as an example of compromising one's personal morality in the interests of my own livelihood. Not that I especially care about it, but I do acknowledge it.
So many of these mendacious twats, however, prostitute themselves by foregoing any sense of decency or professional integrity in pursuance of what they must themselves know to be intellectually dishonest coverage. Laughable that, in doing so, they should try to claim the moral high ground in the way that they do.
Someone like Wallace is so nauseatingly smug in the way he tries to project himself when doing this. He can be a manifestly partial, shameless fake-news liar if he really wants to, but don't try and fucking gaslight us.
I asked AI if I wrote a story whilst chomping on a red cock what would it be about & it came up with Wallace in the Telegraph.
Stefan’s remarks are unanswerable. We are just asking them to delay the vote.Fucking hell Simon Jordan agreeing with City