Isn't that what happens now? ;)
And also after about 38 minutes in SSL
Isn't that what happens now? ;)
We won’t challenge the rules as a whole, imho. Too complex and time consuming, for what? We will see off the APT thing and then concentrate on 115.But, FFP/PSR itself was not challenged, only the APT/FMV element, so that was not really considered by the tribunal.
I would have thought there may be potential to challenge current FFP/PSR on the basis that by object it is designed and has the effect of keeping the rich rich and the poor poor with no realistic prospect of any club outside of the 'big 6' ever bridging that gap.
I think it's pretty clear that PSR rules are a restriction on competition, it's whether that restriction would be deemed to be in the public interest that would be likely to be determinative if any club does eventually challenge the rules as a whole.
We won’t challenge the rules as a whole, imho. Too complex and time consuming for what? We will see off the APT thing and then concentrate on 115.
But the rules are illegal.And they benefit you, ultimately. I don't think we (Newcastle) will challenge them either, as we seem very keen to appear to be playing by the rules. I think it's more likely to come if any club is actually relegated as a result of a points deduction.
But the rules are illegal.
Now is the time to stand side by side with City.
I’m surprised the vote is going ahead at all.