City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

[The Stockport Iniesta]

it might be the end of the beginning

Thanks Winston.

 

[Really_here]

It's not tomorrow......

Ta, when is it then?

 

[Chris-NCL]

In that case the Newcastle hierarchy should challenge them. It doesn't sound like it is City's battle. We have more than enough on our plate.

We (Newcastle United) had a board/fan talk in at our fanzone, and online this evening. All members of the board made their disdain for PSR well and truly heard. I’d be absolutely amazed if we didn’t vote with you tomorrow.

 

[Albeeeert]

In that case the Newcastle hierarchy should challenge them. It doesn't sound like it is City's battle. We have more than enough on our plate.

I agree, I think our hierarchy should be challenging PSR but it doesn't look like they're going to.

 

[oakiecokie]

I agree, I think our hierarchy should be challenging PSR but it doesn't look like they're going to.

Your fan mate above this has said opposite.

 

[Champions again in 2012]

We (Newcastle United) had a board/fan talk in at our fanzone, and online this evening. All members of the board made their disdain for PSR well and truly heard. I’d be absolutely amazed if we didn’t vote with you tomorrow.

But will they make any challenges outside what seems to be City's remit?

Ps - the vote is on Friday

 

[lancs blue]

Janice was on Thank Your Lucky Stars. Embarrassed I remember it!

Wasn't she - she was Janice - on "Thank your lucky stars" wit Brian Matthew on Granada early on a Saturday evening?

Obviously my memory is definitely going, could have sworn it was JBJ.

 

[Albeeeert]

Your fan mate above this has said opposite.

Our hierarchy has said since the takeover that they don't like PSR and have spoken out and voted against the changes the PL brought in specifically to restrict us, but there's been no indication that our hierarchy is actually willing to bring a legal challenge against the rules.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't. It isn't mandatory. I don't know what happened in City's case.

Oaths/affirmations at tribunals are increasingly de rigueur. Assumed they’d be mandatory at an arbitration hearing.

 

[oakiecokie]

Our hierarchy has said since the takeover that they don't like PSR and have spoken out and voted against the changes the PL brought in specifically to restrict us, but there's been no indication that our hierarchy is actually willing to bring a legal challenge against the rules.

I nor your mate has said anything about legal challenges but by all accounts they do appear to be in support of City in agreeing that they will not be voting in favour of any "new" rules.