gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Not sure why there’s a ? against Forest. They are as nailed on as Villa.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,123
Not sure why there’s a ? against Forest. They are as nailed on as Villa.
Yes. Fwiw, I think it comes down to how Chelsea and Everton decide to vote. And there may well be he a handful of abstentions as this is all getting needlessly confrontational. If 6 other clubs abstain, then five against kills it in any case.
I am still amazed the PL are going ahead with it. They (or should I say the cartel) seem to be desperately trying to stop something really significant happening, imho.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I’ve posited before, and I certainly don’t mind repeating it again, the cunts don’t know what they’re doing.I am still amazed the PL are going ahead with it. They (or should I say the cartel) seem to be desperately trying to stop something really significant happening, imho.
Ta, when is it then?
It is now tomorrow…… (unless the PL pull the vote during the course of today…..)
Juke Box Jury rated songs as Hit or Miss, they didn’t give marks out of five. Hopefully tomorrow will be a miss for Richard Masters’ latest re-release (clumsy attempt to keep on-topic….)Obviously my memory is definitely going, could have sworn it was JBJ.
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 17,629
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Will clubs be taking legal advice before voting or just relying on what the pl have told them ?
Find it odd that some lawyers would be advising their clients to vote for illegal rules. Or advising them to vote before the panel have announced its recommendations.
Find it odd that some lawyers would be advising their clients to vote for illegal rules. Or advising them to vote before the panel have announced its recommendations.
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,643
I’ve posited before, and I certainly don’t mind repeating it again, the cunts don’t know what they’re doing.
How the fuck can they expect to win a case when they couldn’t even list the charges correctly that they’ve been investigating…….
As soon as they were told they’d got that wrong, they should have known it’s beyond their capability.
Some lawyers will advise voting against and yet be ignored by their clubs, others may think that the amendments are lawful.Will clubs be taking legal advice before voting or just relying on what the pl have told them ?
Find it odd that some lawyers would be advising their clients to vote for illegal rules. Or advising them to vote before the panel have announced its recommendations.
Wait and see must be our watchword.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
That’s a directly connected example, but there are many others. For an organisation that size, that carries such strategic and economic importance to the UK, it’s astonishing how inept the PL is.How the fuck can they expect to win a case when they couldn’t even list the charges correctly that they’ve been investigating…….
As soon as they were told they’d got that wrong, they should have known it’s beyond their capability.
I expect that is likely to be further underlined this week.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
A punter is always at liberty to ignore the sensible advice they’ve been given!Some lawyers will advise voting against and yet be ignored by their clubs, others may think that the amendments are lawful.
Wait and see must be our watchword.