Blackley_Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Nov 2021
- Messages
- 1,701
- Team supported
- City
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 29,430
Think this is the crux of it.Whatever is in the Tribunal fininds will have to accepted and implemented by both sides and if reqired another vote.
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,556
Tyranny of the majority… fuck em!
Same as last time and same will result again, they can vote it in at 19-1 and if it aint legal it doesnt make a single jot of difference, this is just the pl trying to push it through before the panel have ruled and when they rule they are going to look stupid AGAIN
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,067
You can imagine the red tops to be back slapping each other and tugging each other off,we'll we may have lost this battle but we will win the war..you set of corrupt wankers...
This wasn't even a battle. It is completely irrelevant. If anything it was an illegal annexation.
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
How is it ok for the league to fix rules to benefit clubs with shareholder loans but won’t fix apt rules that damage other clubs?
If anything this vote has shown the whole thing to be a collective stitch up. Every club is only voting for there own interests, looks bad and gives the gov regulators another foot in the door.
The league’s explanation why these rules have been brought is not a true correct factual statement. In short, lying corrupt cunts.
Have city managed to get the rules changed enough to allow the deal we want to make with etihad go through?
It’s no victory as the dishonest media portray it. Shambles and unregulated mess.
Or
“tyranny of the majority”.
Time we get some shareholder loans? Play these yanks at their own game.
Edit: the other thing that annoys me about this 16/4 is that 3 of those stupid fuckers won’t be in the league next season.
Fooball is such a cesspit. Shame
If anything this vote has shown the whole thing to be a collective stitch up. Every club is only voting for there own interests, looks bad and gives the gov regulators another foot in the door.
The league’s explanation why these rules have been brought is not a true correct factual statement. In short, lying corrupt cunts.
Have city managed to get the rules changed enough to allow the deal we want to make with etihad go through?
It’s no victory as the dishonest media portray it. Shambles and unregulated mess.
Or
“tyranny of the majority”.
Time we get some shareholder loans? Play these yanks at their own game.
Edit: the other thing that annoys me about this 16/4 is that 3 of those stupid fuckers won’t be in the league next season.
Fooball is such a cesspit. Shame
Last edited:
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,556
As Martin Samuel wrote you can’t get any more associated party deal than a 0% shareholder loan.
The Red Shirt Cartel clubs, and Spurs, Brighton, Chelsea, and West Ham (7) were never going to vote with City. Everton (1) weren’t going to vote with City because of their loans from the owner to the club. Think there was another club with the same issue. City, Villa, Newcastle and Forest voted against (4) It will be interesting to see how the other 8 clubs voted, against or abstained.
Can anyone actually summarise what the latest amended rules mean? Why is this a 'win' for the PL and what does it mean for City?As Martin Samuel wrote you can’t get any more associated party deal than a 0% shareholder loan.