City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

I don’t know if it’s been mentioned on here already or not, but here it goes.

Liverpool fan, Lord Bassam of Brighton has proposed an amendment in the football governance bill that would prohibit owners who are heads of states, or members of an government (world wide), immediate family members of any of those, and any sovereign wealth fund.

Liverpool and their chums are not satisfied with doing the work via the Premier League, but are trying to enact actual laws of the land to prevent any competition.

Funnily enough, he hasn’t proposed any laws to force the removal of any clubs owners who have tried to form any breakaway leagues (ESL), or steal control of football in England (project big picture).
 
I don’t know if it’s been mentioned on here already or not, but here it goes.

Liverpool fan, Lord Bassam of Brighton has proposed an amendment in the football governance bill that would prohibit owners who are heads of states, or members of an government (world wide), immediate family members of any of those, and any sovereign wealth fund.

Liverpool and their chums are not satisfied with doing the work via the Premier League, but are trying to enact actual laws of the land to prevent any competition.

Funnily enough, he hasn’t proposed any laws to force the removal of any clubs owners who have tried to form any breakaway leagues (ESL), or steal control of football in England (project big picture).
Or any proposal to force the removal of sponsors who have funded terrorist organisations. Or sponsors whose country have taken part in genocide. Or minority owners who have dodged paying tax to HMRC.
 
I don’t know if it’s been mentioned on here already or not, but here it goes.

Liverpool fan, Lord Bassam of Brighton has proposed an amendment in the football governance bill that would prohibit owners who are heads of states, or members of an government (world wide), immediate family members of any of those, and any sovereign wealth fund.

Liverpool and their chums are not satisfied with doing the work via the Premier League, but are trying to enact actual laws of the land to prevent any competition.

Funnily enough, he hasn’t proposed any laws to force the removal of any clubs owners who have tried to form any breakaway leagues (ESL), or steal control of football in England (project big picture).
Untitled.png
 
I don’t know if it’s been mentioned on here already or not, but here it goes.

Liverpool fan, Lord Bassam of Brighton has proposed an amendment in the football governance bill that would prohibit owners who are heads of states, or members of an government (world wide), immediate family members of any of those, and any sovereign wealth fund.

Liverpool and their chums are not satisfied with doing the work via the Premier League, but are trying to enact actual laws of the land to prevent any competition.

Funnily enough, he hasn’t proposed any laws to force the removal of any clubs owners who have tried to form any breakaway leagues (ESL), or steal control of football in England (project big picture).
Aye, definitely going to be successful in getting the government to effectively strip one of the prized assets of a group who have invested literally billions in to the UK & continue to do so. Sure it’d go down well.
 
Aye, definitely going to be successful in getting the government to effectively strip one of the prized assets of a group who have invested literally billions in to the UK & continue to do so. Sure it’d go down well.
Considering the guy who opened the reading of the bill that day he proposed that amendment is a Newcastle United fan, and a Tory who is well into the open and free capitalistic market, I’m fairly convinced he alone would vote down the amendment as it’s voted on, on Wednesday.
However the point that he’s trying this, either at the request of Liverpool FC, or taking it upon himself to do it on behalf of Liverpool FC and out his own personal gain above the bill, or the country, is nothing short of a disgrace.
 
I didn't get where I am today without being annoying! Hope you are totally wrong though, except on the 115 outcome of course - what are your odds on us wiping the floor with the PL?
I think it’s unlikely this conspiracy occurred given the circumstances and individuals who would have to have been involved and its unlikely it can be proved in such a commission. And City are supremely confident. But I’ve enough bruises with complex legal cases to be careful not to be too sure of anything.
 
Or any proposal to force the removal of sponsors who have funded terrorist organisations. Or sponsors whose country have taken part in genocide. Or minority owners who have dodged paying tax to HMRC.
Or hacked other clubs...
 
I think it’s unlikely this conspiracy occurred given the circumstances and individuals who would have to have been involved and its unlikely it can be proved in such a commission. And City are supremely confident. But I’ve enough bruises with complex legal cases to be careful not to be too sure of anything.
'irrefutable evidence' is my go to comforter ;-)
 
I think it’s unlikely this conspiracy occurred given the circumstances and individuals who would have to have been involved and its unlikely it can be proved in such a commission. And City are supremely confident. But I’ve enough bruises with complex legal cases to be careful not to be too sure of anything.
But I bet you never had Lord Pannick in your corner Stefan.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.