That's a ridiculous statement.
Is it?
That's a ridiculous statement.
I presume the rule changes that we objected to were the ones passed in February. My take is those changes passed then were due to takes effect this season and would be included in this years rule book.Can’t see one listed on PL website since July 23/24. No sign of one issued in February 2024.
Strangely - the link to the 23/24 one won’t open …..
Due to “an error”
Premier League - Digital Handbook
test.digitalhandbook.premierleague.com
In fairness, their owners aren't related to the Saudis. Ours are, as they are from the same side of the world.
That’s my train of thought tooI presume the rule changes that we objected to were the ones passed in February. My take is those changes passed then were due to takes effect this season and would be included in this years rule book.
If the rule book is the same as last year then my guess would be they haven’t been added. Just an uninformed guess to be fair.
Bit of a stretch there Coat, lad.
I think he's demonstrated how loosely the APT definitions can be interpreted if the will is there quite wellBit of a stretch there Coat, lad.
I think he's demonstrated how loosely the APT definitions can be interpreted if the will is there quite well
I'll assume you were being ironic.Is it?
Was @Coatigan sarcastically mimicking the PL logic?That's a ridiculous statement.