City launch legal action against the Premier League | Unconfirmed reports that City have secured "potentially significant victory" (p 808)

[Elliot houghton]

I'm not believing anything until I hear it from Magic Hat!

Got to be someone burner account Harris most likely

 

[SebastianBlue]

So, to recap:

Something or nothing may have happened.

City may have won, the league may have won, it may be a split decision, or no decision has been made.

Various outlets may or may not have insider information, may be making up shite to get clicks and engagement, or are being fed misinformation by various rival club management or the league itself.

The APT rules change vote may have been pulled because APT is being changed, it is not being changed, or it has not been decided if they will change.

And Tariq continues to be a knownothing Liverpool shill **** of the highest order.

I think that is a comprehensive update.

 

[Eric Hitchmough]

So, to recap:

Something or nothing may have happened.

City may have won, the league may have won, it may be a split decision, or no decision has been made.

Various outlets may or may not have insider information, may be making up shite to get clicks and engagement, or are being fed misinformation by various rival club management or the league itself.

The APT rules change vote may have been pulled because APT is being changed, it is not being changed, or it has not been decided if they will change.

And Tariq continues to be a knownothing Liverpool shill **** of the highest order.

I think that is a comprehensive update.

And Rodri is either starting on Saturday or returning some time in the next 12 months.

 

[remember arthur mann]

Please could you tell me if we have won,what does it mean we can spend more on transfers or what ?

I don't think anything will change. City have always run a tight ship.

 

[dickie davies]

So, to recap:

Something or nothing may have happened.

City may have won, the league may have won, it may be a split decision, or no decision has been made.

Various outlets may or may not have insider information, may be making up shite to get clicks and engagement, or are being fed misinformation by various rival club management or the league itself.

The APT rules change vote may have been pulled because APT is being changed, it is not being changed, or it has not been decided if they will change.

And Tariq continues to be a knownothing Liverpool shill **** of the highest order.

I think that is a comprehensive update.

Well I suppose that's possible

 

[horlock_was_super]

I would, but my wrists aren’t what they used to be.

Mine too.
Bloody RSI.
Ahem.

 

[Brendan110_0]

If the vote went ahead as planned then it'd be reported we lost. IMO there's no better barometer for the actual verdict. City 1 - PL 0

 

[Brendan110_0]

Imagine the world where Liverpool, Arsenal and United get to veto your sponsors, continually downgrading them to below their levels because "City can't possibly have sponsor values above us!"

This is where the APT rules were heading. We're fighting a war for control of the PL, we need to win at all costs so the game can move forward. These yanks need to invest the money not steal it from the clubs if they want to compete, the anti has been upped.

 

[billblu]

If the vote went ahead as planned then it'd be reported we lost. IMO there's no better barometer for the actual verdict. City 1 - PL 0

some of these arsenal lot can't hold there own piss if the premier league had been successful we'd all know about it by now

 

[MMA]

Harris is fucking hurting!!

Magic Hat..
The massive twat.