City launch legal action against the Premier League | Unconfirmed reports that City have secured "potentially significant victory" (p 808)

[The Stockport Iniesta]

I’d be amazed if it’s United , Liverpool , Arsenal , Spurs, who have sided with the PL.

What drugs are you taking?

There's an argument, the rags might not be against us on this one, but the others?

Must be some strong shit.

 

[flb]

What drugs are you taking?

There's an argument, the rags might not be against us on this one, but the others?

Must be some strong shit.

So the rags but nobody else ?

 

[The Stockport Iniesta]

So the rags but nobody else ?

If it even includes the rags, maybe not. The others will all be in the PL corner though, as it's them who are behind the rules changing.

 

[oakiecokie]

What drugs are you taking?

There's an argument, the rags might not be against us on this one, but the others?

Must be some strong shit.

I can`t understand why people don`t think that the Rags would side with us. Remember who their new CEO is ? Yep our very own ex City lad who will have briefed Scruffy Jim the benefits of scrubbing this shit PL legislation.
Thats is my take on it and much like yours TSI.

 

[ufo]

Don’t you dare you make it to 115. Whoever does, is the culprit.

 

[halfcenturyup]

The leak is a serious breach of confidentiality but I'm not sure it can be contempt because it is not a criminal trial and there is no jury. It is usually held that judges and senior lawyers are too experienced to allow themselves to be influenced by media coverage.

But the leak is a breach of the contract between the club and the PL. They provided confidential information to the clubs and were responsible for its confidentiality. It's even more embarrassing for the arbitrators who approved the communication. They may not like that very much. In any case, it doesn't harm City's case, that's for sure.

 

[TonyM]

It'll be 116 before we know it.

 

[butlerkb]

This should help club's image, sigh. Seems so unnecessary to me. Unless they've got real dirt, which I doubt. Exhausting being a City fan.

Is fair market value a bad thing, really? Or is it not being used fairly?

Makes us look greedy and dismissive of the league as a whole.At the same time they are defending the 115 charges too, so I’m sure greater minds than mine are behind this, but it won’t win us any popularity contests.Also, if unlimited spending prevails, we risk turning premier league into La Ligurian or SPL !Not sure how I feel on this.

 

[RobinHood]

 

[Mancityphilfo2000]

So the premier league clubs suggest a vote from which the majority are all american owned to stop inflated sponsorship.a rigged vote where theres only one outcome seems fair!.