City launch legal action against the Premier League | Unconfirmed reports that City have secured "potentially significant victory" (p 808)

Pablo ZZZ Peroni said:
Maybe because Lawton speciifcally stated it was 115 when he dropped the story might have somegthing to do with it..

Man City hearing: Premier League officials told to disclose texts and emails​


exclusive

Senior officials hand over messages before November hearing into 115 charges against the club with separate hearing over City’s legal action against league set to begin on Monday​

Click to expand...
Think the whole story is confused nonsense. In both cases, City would have disclosure rights from the PL. Neither will have been "everything mentioning Manchester City". The disclosure would have been key word, date and custodian sensitive and will have been either agreed or established by the IC or arbitration if in dispute. Absolutely standard 2 way disclosure.
 
There was a suggestion/statement that the IC would only sit into a second week to consider City's claim for damages and that depended on City's winning its claims against APT regulations. Do we know if the IC is still sitting? And do we have any clarification of the significance of last week's proceedings? Could it be that the order to the PL to present all emails concerning City is connected to the claims of discrimination against our club?
 
StillBluessinceHydeRoad said:
There was a suggestion/statement that the IC would only sit into a second week to consider City's claim for damages and that depended on City's winning its claims against APT regulations. Do we know if the IC is still sitting? And do we have any clarification of the significance of last week's proceedings? Could it be that the order to the PL to present all emails concerning City is connected to the claims of discrimination against our club?
Click to expand...

No it was 2 full weeks allocated for this hearing and then another one will be scheduled if needed to determine damages.
 
StillBluessinceHydeRoad said:
There was a suggestion/statement that the IC would only sit into a second week to consider City's claim for damages and that depended on City's winning its claims against APT regulations. Do we know if the IC is still sitting? And do we have any clarification of the significance of last week's proceedings? Could it be that the order to the PL to present all emails concerning City is connected to the claims of discrimination against our club?
Click to expand...

Nah mate we know fuck all tbf.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.