remember arthur mann
Well-Known Member
Hopefully he's making a nice butty out of them.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | Unconfirmed reports that City have secured "potentially significant victory" (p 808)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
As the scousers say ... that proves City are guiltyArgh now why is Stefan so calm, collected and eloquent if City are innocent?
Or
Why is Stefan on Talksport if City are innocent ?
Fair, but are there no alternatives out there that aren't so wank?If you’re able to understand it for what it is, it’s a station to have on to pass the time. I work from home and have it on most of the working day.
If you’re unable to understand it for what it is and get upset about it, it’s not for you.
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Norman Bates more like.
He`s more like Master Bates.Wild isn't it?!
LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
Never needed to look.Fair, but are there no alternatives out there that aren't so wank?
Moss Side's Finest
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2018
- Messages
- 1,265
Just wait for them to twist his words to make some headlines this afternoonAs ever, Stefan calm, collected and eloquent. Thank you.
Jordan is spouting hate for sureThe problem is they also spread a lot of hate
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
CousinJust wait for them to twist his words to make some headlines this afternoon
needs putting on bingo cards
lol fucking piece of shit , where the fuck was jordan and his **** mouth when rags and red shirt had a free hit? Why was he not concerned back then ?More of the same unfortunately. Stefan having to repeat points he has made well previously, whilst Jordan just spurges the same clickbait garbage about city's owners wanting to have free rein to do whatever they like.
supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 13,516
I can't help but feel that whilst this legal challenge undoubtedly has a chance of success, it's also a case of City's lawyers wanting an arbitrator to make a few statements which we can take to the PL panel. The bold and forthright statements about the "tyranny of the majority" and discrimination might not have success in law, but we could get some useful commentary from an arbitrator to take to the PL panel and bolster our arguments.
Based on the fact the PL have been asked to share emails/whatsapp messages to the PL panel, we're clearly pushing hard on the discrimination point. Even a statement from the arbitrator saying "the voting patterns and evidence submitted by Manchester City FC are concerning" whilst ultimately dismissing our case. Take that to the PL panel and alongside an email from the red shirts saying "why haven't you relegated these cheats yet" and it's job done.
Based on the fact the PL have been asked to share emails/whatsapp messages to the PL panel, we're clearly pushing hard on the discrimination point. Even a statement from the arbitrator saying "the voting patterns and evidence submitted by Manchester City FC are concerning" whilst ultimately dismissing our case. Take that to the PL panel and alongside an email from the red shirts saying "why haven't you relegated these cheats yet" and it's job done.