City lead Premier League rebels but refuseniks come up short

Brendan110_0

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 Aug 2009
Messages
5,052
Location
DO ONE
A gang of six Premier League clubs strongly opposed to wage restraint in the top flight held a clandestine meeting last week to discuss how they can best combat the measures.

The summit at the Grove Hotel outside Watford, where England stay before Wembley matches, was attended by the refusenik group of Manchester City, Fulham, Reading, Aston Villa, West Bromwich and Southampton.


The Premier League executive, who had lobbied so hard to get their proposal limiting the amount of TV money spent on players’ wages voted through by the narrowest of margins, had no knowledge about the gathering arranged by Southampton finance director Gareth Rogers.
Because the rule changes were accepted by a two-thirds majority, the rebel clubs can only fight the details of the regulations, which will be put to the 20 clubs a week today, rather than derail a process that includes restrictions on club losses over a three-year period.


Reading were at the Grove despite having controversially abstained from the 13-6 vote over the way the plans were presented. However, Swansea, who had voted against, were absent. They are understood to have switched sides after it was explained that TV money from European competitions are not included in the Premier League restrictions.


So as it stands, the current 14-6 balance would allow the rule changes to be implemented. Legal action was not on the Grove agenda.


Source - Daily Mail
 
All this pisses me off. I just have complete faith in the guys that run our club.
 
oakiecokie said:
I thought Reading abstained in the vote ??

If Reading had voted with us(and why didn`t they ?) the whole fuckin` idea would have been kyboshed.
 
Brendan110_0 said:
However, Swansea, who had voted against, were absent. They are understood to have switched sides after it was explained that TV money from European competitions are not included in the Premier League restrictions.Source - Daily Mail

Anyone understand what that means ?
 
Wreckless Alec said:
Brendan110_0 said:
However, Swansea, who had voted against, were absent. They are understood to have switched sides after it was explained that TV money from European competitions are not included in the Premier League restrictions.Source - Daily Mail

Anyone understand what that means ?

With Swansea and Reading on board, they can't get it through so it's obviously very close.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.