City v PL | Legal Dispute/Appeal

The story has absolutely no substance to it. The quote from the PL does not support the headline. The article is padded out with reference to the legal action by victims of Barry Bennell. It seems really strange, even for a paper like the Mail.

Cut and shut 3 stories together, it’s written more in speculative hope rather than matter of fact. Kudos to him if he can pay his mortgage writing utter drivel.
 
His wife recently passed away but that doesn't excuse him from being a ****. He was a **** before and will continue to be a **** in the future.
The current issue of Social Media abuse can sometimes be started by wankers like Harris, what does he expect when his anti City articles contain apparent hatred and bile towards our club?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CC1
The story has absolutely no substance to it. The quote from the PL does not support the headline. The article is padded out with reference to the legal action by victims of Barry Bennell. It seems really strange, even for a paper like the Mail.
Also the comments from the Premier League about not making any further comments look about 2 years old, not recent
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.