St.Pauli support
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 4,657
There's something wrong.
If CJ was out of contract per today and a free agent,
why do we talk about a sell-on fee? Is that a general rule in combination with compensation for academy players? Anyone?
EDIT:
Found this one from 2016:
"In deciding on a compensation figure, it is not uncommon for the PFCC to set fees that build as the player becomes more established at first team level. It has now become quite usual for clubs to receive a basic compensation fee with further payments becoming due on the player’s debut, following a certain numbers of first-team appearances and after international appearances. It is also usual for there to be a sell-on fee should the player be sold at a profit at any point in the future."
http://fullcontactlaw.co.uk/2016/11/compensation-players-24-mystery/
If CJ was out of contract per today and a free agent,
why do we talk about a sell-on fee? Is that a general rule in combination with compensation for academy players? Anyone?
EDIT:
Found this one from 2016:
"In deciding on a compensation figure, it is not uncommon for the PFCC to set fees that build as the player becomes more established at first team level. It has now become quite usual for clubs to receive a basic compensation fee with further payments becoming due on the player’s debut, following a certain numbers of first-team appearances and after international appearances. It is also usual for there to be a sell-on fee should the player be sold at a profit at any point in the future."
http://fullcontactlaw.co.uk/2016/11/compensation-players-24-mystery/
Last edited: