Claudio Bravo Injury - Muric Recalled from NAC Breda

Probably not but we need a lot more from a keeper than just making saves, unless they can read the game, be calm under pressure and pass the ball it weakens our whole team.
I have no idea whether Grimshaw or Muric can or can't but it isn't the same as Burnley losing a keeper.
You're right. Being a GK at City is not like at any other Prem team (except Liverpool). Any City keeper has to be constantly switched on with our style - e.g. when our CBs split to create the gap through which our GK will play the ball - sometimes it's a small gap - with no hesitation.
 
What about we recall Muric and loan Grimshaw to Breda?

Neither are back up in a Pep team. I dont think bravo is either for what it's worth.

It's a unique position, as many are, in this city side.

I'm not suggesting we need perfection in a role like this but it needs to be something close.

Needle in a hay stack.
 
It's incredible what some people post on here, often wonder if they've been watching the same players/games!

Could make 10+ page thread with the errors Bravo has made.

Unfortunate about his injury from the point of view of no one wants to see a player hurt, but hardly a loss. Makes the league cup games less stressful to watch at least!

Name 6 'errors' leading to goals.
 
Well that's when a player shows his true worth. Was Pope ready when he got thrown into the Burnley team last year?

Pope was 25 with loads of games throughout the leagues. We also require a very specific skill set from our keepers. Hence why Bravo was so important.
 
Any thoughts on Roman Weidenfeller, only just retired from Dortmund and been used to being no 2 for recent seasons.
 
If we're going that route then I agree he was error strewn but I personally don't class weak attempts at saves as errors.

if you don't class weak attempts at saves as errors, then I'm not sure where to start. If a goalkeeper can't save simple shots then that's an error. He's made loads of them.


Name 6 'errors' leading to goals.

When I'm not in work I'll come back to this one, but I don't think I said 'leading to goals' specifically, that's your additional caveat.
I think at one point in his first year he had maybe the 3rd worst shot to save ratio int he league. So depends if you want to get into semantics about what classes as an "error".
I'd say the majority of his attempted saves were shit and cost us a lot of points.

But maybe that's just me
 
if you don't class weak attempts at saves as errors, then I'm not sure where to start. If a goalkeeper can't save simple shots then that's an error. He's made loads of them.




When I'm not in work I'll come back to this one, but I don't think I said 'leading to goals' specifically, that's your additional caveat.
I think at one point in his first year he had maybe the 3rd worst shot to save ratio int he league. So depends if you want to get into semantics about what classes as an "error".
I'd say the majority of his attempted saves were shit and cost us a lot of points.

But maybe that's just me

Ederson' shot to save ratio is also relatively poor. Nothing to do with his keeping.

Bravo was often blamed for goals he had next to no chance with. I remember many fans bringing up his saves to shots ratio after Spurs at home in the 2-2. It was lunacy.

Mistakes not leading to goals? So just general things you disagree with.

As I say, name 6 six errors leading to goals.
It was just a popular narrative with little factual evidence.
 
Yet again Tommcfc speaking the truth and yet again the City happy clappers refusing to have any of it. I often wondered in Bravo's first season, why the fuck he bothered wearing goalie gloves, so seldom did he actually save a ball. The clappers can quote stats all they like. Anyone with eyes could see that Bravo at one point couldn't save shit.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.