Clinton v Trump debate - 2am BBC News 24

M M

mat

Guest
For a presidential debate this has got car crash TV written all over it.

Crooked Hillary has allegedly been swatting up for weeks whilst the Orange Hitler has been reported as doing little or no preparation.

I hope Clinton took up Bill Mahers offer to write some put downs to wind him up. It could turn into the elitist version of a Jerry Springer episode.
 
mat said:
For a presidential debate this has got car crash TV written all over it.

Crooked Hillary has allegedly been swatting up for weeks whilst the Orange Hitler has been reported as doing little or no preparation.

I hope Clinton took up Bill Mahers offer to write some put downs to wind him up. It could turn into the elitist version of a Jerry Springer episode.
Click to expand...
If true, you've got to admire the chutzpah of a man who does little or no preparation for a US Presidential debate.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
If true, you've got to admire the chutzpah of a man who does little or no preparation for a US Presidential debate.
Click to expand...
Indeed.

He knows how to handle a TV audience, I'll give him that. One snappy slogan and he'll have all the press writing about it in the morning whilst turning it into a 90 minute prime time infomercial on Trump products.

I can't see how Clinton will play it.
 
mat said:
Indeed.

He knows how to handle a TV audience, I'll give him that. One snappy slogan and he'll have all the press writing about it in the morning whilst turning it into a 90 minute prime time infomercial on Trump products.

I can't see how Clinton will play it.
Click to expand...
I've always admired people with big bollocks, even if I don't like them on a personal level. I've had work colleagues down the years who I've not got on that well with, who I respected because they've got a lot of bottle. I'm not talking about people who lack judgement or are reckless btw, but people who back themselves and aren't afraid of making a mistake. Conversely, I have little time for those who are weak, indecisive and paralysed by fear of making the wrong call, especially those who are well rewarded for making decisions.
 
Trump will have a few put downs and sound bits, whilst displaying his index finger and saying OK a lot, I'm hoping his combover is epic tonight, it should come from so far back that he's pulling his arse hairs over his head.

Hilary will look deranged, and be far too clever and slick for your average red state voter.

Result will be a probable tie with both claiming victory.
 
Obviously he's a massive tw@, but out of them two - I think I'd actually prefer Trump to be POTUS.

Only for the reasons that it'd be hard for him to be taken seriously by our government and I reckon that would be an obstacle to the US striking any dodgy TTIP type deal with us which we need to prevent. He'd probably milk the US for himself but I don't think he could legally see out his "kick out the muslims" mentality (for the US citizens). The US has that balance of power in Congress.

Clinton is clearly a corporate, criminal puppet to line her own pockets and see out the Clinton agenda. I reckon the US would be involved in a lot more airstrikes/wars/conflicts with her at the helm.

Whichever is best for US corporations (and their agendas) staying well away from us is good for me.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
I've always admired people with big bollocks, even if I don't like them on a personal level. I've had work colleagues down the years who I've not got on that well with, who I respected because they've got a lot of bottle. I'm not talking about people who lack judgement or are reckless btw, but people who back themselves and aren't afraid of making a mistake. Conversely, I have little time for those who are weak, indecisive and paralysed by fear of making the wrong call, especially those who are well rewarded for making decisions.
Click to expand...

Interesting comment that; they aren't mutually exclusive are they? Or very fine margins let's put it like that!
 
CitizenTID said:
Obviously he's a massive tw@, but out of them two - I think I'd actually prefer Trump to be POTUS.

Only for the reasons that it'd be hard for him to be taken seriously by our government and I reckon that would be an obstacle to the US striking any dodgy TTIP type deal with us which we need to prevent. He'd probably milk the US for himself but I don't think he could legally see out his "kick out the muslims" mentality (for the US citizens). The US has that balance of power in Congress.

Clinton is clearly a corporate, criminal puppet to line her own pockets and see out the Clinton agenda. I reckon the US would be involved in a lot more airstrikes/wars/conflicts with her at the helm.

Whichever is best for US corporations (and their agendas) staying well away from us is good for me.
Click to expand...
Indeed.

The Koch Brothers and Goldman Sachs know where their breads buttered
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.