Club World Cup, are you against or for it?

against - its about creating a global SKY 4 - no interest in supporters and marketing a product not proper sport with a risk element like promotion and relegation - mark my words this comes off in 100 years there will be talk of an intergalatctic cup and moon dwellers will be moaning it panders to Martians whilst $10tr will be put up by a consortium led by fucking BT or British Gas or some **** bankrolls it................ there rant over
 
nope, fucking harlem globetrotter approach, exhibition stuff to rake in the cash, nothing to do with sport, competition or even football
 
From a sporting point of view, I think it's a terrible idea. But spending a few weeks abroad watching City in a 'World Cup' tournament setting would be brilliant.
 
Apparently it's been put on hold, after the history clubs wanted to turn it into a closed shop. Martin Samuel did a good article about it yesterday, sorry can't link to it as I'm on the ps4.
 
I am against it on principle unless selection for it is purely on current merit, not what cups you won 50 years ago or how many fans you have in China, or whether you have the biggest pot noodle sponsorship in your league. In fact all football competitions should be based on current merit. I would like to see the whole concept of Uefa coefficients abolished along with any form of seeding or mini leagues. The European Champions League, for example, should be a straight knock out competition and if Real draw Barcelona (or City United) in the first round, tough titty. The object should not be to provide guaranteed big bucks for the "big" teams.
 
Man City could be snubbed by lucrative new FIFA Club World Cup tournament
Manchester United and Liverpool have already been touted as invitees to the proposed 2021 tournament but Man City would be left to fight for one of three places
Fifa are planning to launch a World Cup for clubs … and Manchester City would not be guaranteed a place, unlike Manchester United and Liverpool.

The world governing body is intent on vamping up the current Club World Cup, which pits the European champions against the top dogs from other continents in a low-key December affair involving seven clubs.
And with a figure of £100million for each club being bandied around, the world's biggest clubs have all sat up and taken notice.

Fifa has even sketched out an idea to launch the competition in the summer of 2012 in China, with 24 teams, using a similar format to the international World Cup.

But the method they have proposed for choosing the 12 European clubs who would be invited to the tournament has stoked up the same kind of stink which Uefa seems to provoke.

The proposal for the initial tournament is to invite the nine clubs who have won at least three European Cups in their history – Real Madrid, AC Milan, Bayern Munich, Barcelona, Liverpool, Ajax, and Inter Milan.

They also throw in Juventus, who have won two tournaments, but have also won two intercontinental titles, perhaps a convenient way of squeezing in a big Italian club but ignoring the other two-time winners – Nottingham Forest, Benfica and Porto.
Basing invitation on past triumphs would leave the rest of Europe scrabbling to fill three vacant spaces, with Fifa as yet unclear as to how that will happen.
It is hard to escape the notion that the “old boys' club” which holds undue sway in international football, is at work again.
The relevance of having won European Cups in the past is highly questionable – Ajax have a success-filled history, but do they deserve a place among the world's elite based on what they did 45 years ago?

And if Fifa want this to be truly an elite competition for the world's best, would Liverpool, United and the Italian clubs really be ahead of City and Paris St Germain?
In the same way that Uefa's originally well-meaning financial fair play rules were warped into being used as a weapon to beat down the nouveaux riche, it seems that Fifa are pandering to the traditional elite.

The Fifa competition has already garnered support, with Real Madrid and Barcelona both speaking positively about the idea, while United chief executive Ed Woodward has spoken of the money-spinning aspect of the event without committing his support.
But it has also run into stiff competition, from Uefa – jealously guarding the Champions League – from the European Clubs Association and from the international players' union, concerned at their members suffering from burn-out.

There is every chance, if the competition does ever get off the ground, that City will be involved, especially as the United Arab Emirates figure strongly among the expected financial backers.

But that is not the point – participation in any football event should be on merit, not by privileged invitation.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.