The Amazon coverage was a so much more enjoyable experience, it really underlined what we have to put up with from the other broadcasters. The most striking thing for me was the difference in Michael Owen. This raised two questions. He is normally appalling, he is boring, monotone and offers little insight, but last night he sounded different, brighter, and his analysis was better. Why that difference last night? Secondly he normally looks like he can't wait to be negative about City, but last night he was genuinely positive. Is he briefed by other broadcasters to be negative about us?