TinFoilHat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2023
- Messages
- 40,076
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Aussies admit they couldn't afford it.
I wonder if anyone else with bother as it is a costly event to host.
Aussies admit they couldn't afford it.
I wonder if anyone else with bother as it is a costly event to host.
Exactly.Who can afford it though?
You beat me too it.This stupid government we have will foot the bill and spin it as a plus ;)
Sunderland/Hartlepool/Leicester/Liverpool 2026It's expensive to host and the most insignificant of tournaments. Which means I fully expect a UK city to step up and host it so they can throw pots of cash at something pointless and pretend it will boost the economy.
Exactly.
We can't but I'm just waiting for the PM to announce London will do it and tell Khan to foot the bill...
Refreshing honesty from the Aussies about the costs. Shame the BBC angle is about contractual agreements.
Why can’t this be funded by Britains new empire? The shady empire of tax havens were trillions are hidden by the fabulously wealthy.
Couldn't even pay for his mother's funeral. Useless billionaire twat.Maybe the king can foot the bill
Hold it at the Etihad and claim £250M off the government for stadium improvements?A lot of top athletes now give this event a miss. Time to junk it. World tiddlywinks and marbles championship would replace it nicely.
I'm sure the BBC could dig up Stuart Hall to host it.Fuck the irrelevant shite off. Have a Commonwealth It’s A Knockone Out instead.
Made some scousers a few quid.Just like when we used to offer to host the Eurovision Song Contest when the previous year's winner couldn't/didn't want to host it in the mistaken belief it gave the the UK and BBC some added prestige. It didn't.