It was just an example.
The one who makes the suggestion needs to provide the evidence, that’s generally how it works.
I could provide my own but it’s not my responsibility.
Well I agree with you up to a point although I managed to find my own evidence in this case. It’s always best to back up a claim with evidence but a one word rebuttal of a claim comes with a certain sense of responsibility to back that sort of dismissal up
Wait..... The moon is made of bollocks?If you tell me the moon is made of cheese and I say it’s bollocks, it’s not on me to provide evidence.
I thought cheese was a kind of meat?Do what? Sell meatless cheese?
Wait..... The moon is made of bollocks?
Those f*cking Clangers were lying all along.
C*nt's.
Ouch!I got checked out last year due to a swollen bollock, my Mrs said it was the size of the moon
No, that's not correct.No because that would be an outlandish claim without any basis in fact and therefore totally lacking credibility. If you were to tell me the moon was made of a specific type of rock and I told you that was bollocks it would be reasonable to expect one of us to point to the evidence available
I shudder to imagine what goes into those fuckers.If God had wanted his beloved Manchester children to be vegetarian he wouldn't have given us Holland's steak puddings.
No, that's not correct.
If I told you that the Moon was made of a certain rock I would have to present a paper to the scientific world with strong evidence of my claim, or I would be laughed at.