Guess the amount of money they’ll lose by null and voiding the WSL is a pittance compared to what they’d lose by null and voiding the PL
You've done a Marv and totally ignored all the supporting cast that are needed to host each game. As for the virus all but gone on a week or so, wishful thinking on your part as many experts would argue otherwuseMy definition of safe is 30 or so athletes under the age of 35, who have tested negative for a virus multiple times that week being allowed to play. The fact the 8 or so out of 1000 have tested positive and taken out of play for 7 days proves the safety measures are working. The first game won't be for a few weeks there's a high chance the virus will be all but gone by then.
Yet more utter bullshit.My definition of safe is 30 or so athletes under the age of 35, who have tested negative for a virus multiple times that week being allowed to play. The fact the 8 or so out of 1000 have tested positive and taken out of play for 7 days proves the safety measures are working. The first game won't be for a few weeks there's a high chance the virus will be all but gone by then.
My definition of safe is 30 or so athletes under the age of 35, who have tested negative for a virus multiple times that week being allowed to play. The fact the 8 or so out of 1000 have tested positive and taken out of play for 7 days proves the safety measures are working. The first game won't be for a few weeks there's a high chance the virus will be all but gone by then.
And what about the other 270 or so people needed to run the show who maybe are not athletes under 35 and not tested multiple times a week,? Just asking
Time to stop fishingGet to watch a match so will be buzzing
Time to stop fishing
No, I wouldn'tWould you not offer to work the match if it meant you were totally distanced and got to watch it? 200 people in a stadium that usually has around 55k in pretty sure they can stay 2 metres apart
Get to watch a match so will be buzzing where can I sign up.