Please define conclusive proof as I assume a referee stating he was ordered to change his report isn't sufficient for you.This thread is embarrassing. You should’ve been asking for and posters providing inconclusive proof. They can’t because it’s all utter bullocks. Hearsay, conjecture, this., that, he said, she said drivel. One poster, just one, post conclusive proof of corruption. We’ll be waiting FOR. EVER.
Neither is another ref stating they all were biased for the rags.