kaz7
Well-Known Member
No but there are posters who are intent on carrying on previous bad feeling,that should stop now,we are in a crisis and we need to stick together,just my opinionAre you having a go at me by any chance?
No but there are posters who are intent on carrying on previous bad feeling,that should stop now,we are in a crisis and we need to stick together,just my opinionAre you having a go at me by any chance?
Complete & utter bollocks.
The number of people who have died after contracting coronavirus in the UK has risen to 144 - as the number of confirmed cases rose 643 to 3,269, according to the Department of Health.
It comes after NHS England confirmed 29 more people had died in England in the past 24 hours, taking the number to 128.
The latest deaths were people between 47 and 96 years old and all had underlying health conditions.
London's death toll went up 16 and now stands at 52.
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-deaths-in-england-rise-to-128-11960226
It's probably something quite common that can fight this virus. For example my missus is taking simvastatin for her ms as they think it may slow it down and its main use is to lower cholesterol. I did see a video on you tube today where it suggests blowing a hairdryer up your nose to heat up the sinuses where the virus is. I would think that would be rather silly although expect Boris to recommend doing it in his statement tomorrow
I got it on the wembley trip,i stayed over as well so could have got it at any time,i spent about 8hrs with worsley and we were linked arms for most of it and talked really close up at the game,he felt ill and they tested him because i had it but it came back negativeKaren couple of questions if it's ok.
Do you have any idea who you picked the virus up from, and do you know of anyone you passed it onto.
Did they test his coat?I got it on the wembley trip,i stayed over as well so could have got it at any time,i spent about 8hrs with worsley and we were linked arms for most of it and talked really close up at the game,he felt ill and they tested him because i had it but it came back negative
In your opinion
My guess is that as long as compliance is above a certain percentage then the policy substantially achieves objectives. And that the incremental benefits from increasing compliance to 100% doesn’t justify the resources involved. Doesn’t justify the risk of public disorder. They don’t want the police or the army out on the streets enforcing a ban. So they’re prepared to tolerate a degree of non compliance that comes from not issuing bans.I may be completely wrong but i still have this nagging feeling that they are leaning towards the idea of riding this out, while they may not admit it on TV it may still be the preferred option.
I thought the policy had changed and that they were going to ban public gatherings, force pubs, clubs, theatres etc.. to close and bring in strict social isolation. It was only this week there was talk of anyone over 70 being told to isolate by the end of the week an possibly other people at risk.
This has also all gone quiet? It may be that they are trying to create a sense of calm and it seemed to be the case tonight.
They should have done,could be anything in thereDid they test his coat?