COVID-19 — Coronavirus

[M18CTID]

An additional 4000 is a fuck of a lot.

Is that additional 4000 deaths outside of hospitals?

 

[Rammy Blue]

Is that additional 4000 deaths outside of hospitals?

Yep. Assume vast majority are care homes.

 

[Claytop]

 

[Rammy Blue]

It’s all fucking gobbledegook, lol.

 

[Claytop]

Is that additional 4000 deaths outside of hospitals?

I’m not sure that’s what it implies, the number includes deaths registered upto the 18th April, the DHSC number won’t have had those.

 

[blueparrot]

An additional 4000 is a fuck of a lot.

It’s about 2500 difference, with the adjusted gov figures though , still a lot, but they will mainly be care homes.

 

[SWP's back]

but I have lost a little faith in them.

You and me both. According to them, there’s no current evidence about anything doing anything, ever. Fence sitting cûnts.

 

[blueparrot]

It’s all fucking gobbledegook, lol.

Think you compare the yellow with light blue and the red with dark blue.

 

[Claytop]

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...landandwalesprovisional/weekending10april2020

Probably has everything on there, going to try make sense of it.

 

[BlueAnorak]

I literally quoted the telegraph article at you and the quotes of the professor that the piece is built around. He suggests there isn't??

All I was saying was the test data showed there are antibodies in the blood of all who have had it just low levels in many. These were picked up by the expensive Porton Down machines used to check the test results. The questions are:
1. Are these small numbers of antibodies sufficient to give immunity in a second wave?
2. Can a test be developed to pick up lower numbers of antibodies?

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

STAY AT HOME. Unless you've got a 200 mile+ round trip for a test, that is. Bring your family too for a good viral top up along the way.

 

[Claytop]

Ok so 83.9% of deaths (8,673) occurred in hospital upto the 10th April.

 

[Chippy_boy]

You and me both. According to them, there’s no current evidence about anything doing anything, ever. Fence sitting cûnts.

I agree. I seriously wonder if they are "bent" in the sense that they are leaned upon by political forces, i.e. their pay masters, to say or to not say certain things.

I am not meaning the UK specifically (or even at all) so this is actually a seperate point, but it is fucking convenient that the UK government faced with a dire shortage of PPE, has decided that there's no benefit in the public wearing PPE, and conveniently they have the idiotic WHO guidelines to back them up.

 

[Manc in London]

That's why I raised the point. Surely she would have seen the ONS report by now and would know the figures? I guess we will find out tomorrow.

15% it appears. Surprisingly, she was way out.

 

[BlueAnorak]

The difference between the yellow line and the red line indicates that it takes on average 5 days to register a death. Holy shit who'd have thought that was remotely possible.

 

[lancs blue]

15% it appears. Surprisingly, she was way out.

The figure she gave was correct up to 3rd April so presumably she had not seen the latest figures at that point.

 

[BlueAnorak]

15% it appears. Surprisingly, she was way out.

To me, it looks like 30% for COVID-19 and 41% for all causes.

 

[lancs blue]

To me, it looks like 30% for COVID-19 and 41% for all causes.

covid-19 : 10335 in total for England and Wales to 10th April, of which 8673 died in hospital, so 83.9% in hospital.

 

[chesterbells]

Yeah, so that ons weekly data published today is the only one I’ve been following tbh, cos it shows all deaths, regardless of whether is was “labelled” a covid related death or not. 18k for week of 10 April (most recent) vs 10k deaths for same week in average of last 5 years. Week before was 16K vs 10k. Week before that, and all previous weeks, the 2020 numbers matched the long term average of between 10 and 12k deaths per week.

 

[BlueAnorak]

covid-19 : 10335 in total for England and Wales to 10th April, of which 8673 died in hospital, so 83.9% in hospital.

Just spotted that.