purplenose
Well-Known Member
So no new infections in London in 24hrs.
Does anybody else find that incredible? I do especially as in many parts of London there has been at best minimal compliance with the lock down, there are huge amounts of the most at risk BAME people and many living close together. Not much of that has changed in the last month infact like everywhere else any adherence to lock down was beginning to fragment in most places. Despite this infections have fallen away to nil.
I am not for one minute suggesting social distancing and lockdown have not had a huge effect or that it was in anyway an over reaction as some are claiming. It was certainly the right thing to do with what was known at the time and we did it too late. Regardless putting the risk of offending by suggesting some communities observed lock down more than others, could this fall in infections be because it simply ran out of people to infect?
If so what does that tell us?
What other reason could there be? Ideas?
Does anybody else find that incredible? I do especially as in many parts of London there has been at best minimal compliance with the lock down, there are huge amounts of the most at risk BAME people and many living close together. Not much of that has changed in the last month infact like everywhere else any adherence to lock down was beginning to fragment in most places. Despite this infections have fallen away to nil.
I am not for one minute suggesting social distancing and lockdown have not had a huge effect or that it was in anyway an over reaction as some are claiming. It was certainly the right thing to do with what was known at the time and we did it too late. Regardless putting the risk of offending by suggesting some communities observed lock down more than others, could this fall in infections be because it simply ran out of people to infect?
If so what does that tell us?
What other reason could there be? Ideas?