Blue Llama
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 May 2009
- Messages
- 5,193
To me that's valuing someone having a new car against someone's life. There are many vulnerable who only find out they are vulnerable when they contract Covid 19. I might sound a bit rabid but tonight one neighbour is entertaining 2 daughters and their partners to a meal in their back garden and on the other side they are going ahead with a party for the mum tomorrow again with 2 daughters and families. To many the government's restriction on families meeting in gardens made no sense against opening pubs etc but this just proves the regulation. Later tonight the 3 households next door will move inside as it gets colder, then 2m separation etc will not happen. The few risking the freedoms of the many by selfish behaviour.Pretty sure that is not anyone’s attitudes. The vulnerable have been advised to shield from day one of this and I don’t see this changing any time soon. The issue at the moment is the vulnerable are shielding and making their own decisions based on what they they think the risk level is to them.
All those not classed as vulnerable are also being impacted massively and are losing jobs, which may lead to losing houses and serious financial issues etc. Both groups of people are being impacted and need to be considered. The high risk can protect themselves by shielding and following guidance, the non-vulnerable have no option as their jobs are being destroyed who is looking out for them?