Daniel Agger (continued)

Status
Not open for further replies.
LongsightM13 said:
onceabluealways said:
Why Always Ste said:
if Agger Was going to City.... he wouldn't of played last night.... SIMPLES!

I totally agree with this
WHile I think you are both right, Nasri and Milner both played a game in the new season for their existing clubs, before finally moving to us following a summer-long saga

League games, not some qualifier that would cup tie them.
 
LongsightM13 said:
onceabluealways said:
Why Always Ste said:
if Agger Was going to City.... he wouldn't of played last night.... SIMPLES!

I totally agree with this
WHile I think you are both right, Nasri and Milner both played a game in the new season for their existing clubs, before finally moving to us following a summer-long saga

yes but that didn't stop them playing for us - Agger would not be able to play in the CL group stages which are massive games. Either he has no plans to sign or liverpool have shoved a big 2 fingers up and said thats tough but you still have to seriously wad out.
 
onceabluealways said:
Why Always Ste said:
if Agger Was going to City.... he wouldn't of played last night.... SIMPLES!

I totally agree with this

didn't Courlka play for us in the EL qualifier (score last penalty in a shoot out) the day before he signed for spurs a few years ago?
 
onceabluealways said:
LongsightM13 said:
onceabluealways said:
I totally agree with this
WHile I think you are both right, Nasri and Milner both played a game in the new season for their existing clubs, before finally moving to us following a summer-long saga

yes but that didn't stop them playing for us - Agger would not be able to play in the CL group stages which are massive games. Either he has no plans to sign or liverpool have shoved a big 2 fingers up and said thats tough but you still have to seriously wad out.

Agger would be able to play in CL games.... I think.
 
onceabluealways said:
LongsightM13 said:
onceabluealways said:
I totally agree with this
WHile I think you are both right, Nasri and Milner both played a game in the new season for their existing clubs, before finally moving to us following a summer-long saga

yes but that didn't stop them playing for us - Agger would not be able to play in the CL group stages which are massive games. Either he has no plans to sign or liverpool have shoved a big 2 fingers up and said thats tough but you still have to seriously wad out.

Agger can play in the group stages!!!
 
Nasri did not play for Arsenal against Udinese (CL) last year for this reason. He signed on 24th of August and Arsenal played against Udinese on 17th of August.
 
onceabluealways said:
LongsightM13 said:
onceabluealways said:
I totally agree with this
WHile I think you are both right, Nasri and Milner both played a game in the new season for their existing clubs, before finally moving to us following a summer-long saga

yes but that didn't stop them playing for us - Agger would not be able to play in the CL group stages which are massive games. Either he has no plans to sign or liverpool have shoved a big 2 fingers up and said thats tough but you still have to seriously wad out.[/quote]

Was just thinking exactly that, our player, we'll play him when and where we want, unless you stump up the money for him that we want, a bit of a 'fuck you' statement I think.
 
Damanino said:
Nasri did not play for Arsenal against Udinese (CL) last year for this reason. He signed on 24th of August and Arsenal played against Udinese on 17th of August.


i think that was because both Arsenal and oursleves would have been in the champions league so he definitely could not have played for us in the champions league at all. not sure about the europa league and champions league and the rule previously quoted is pretty ambiguous.

dale johnson of espn says he could still play for us in the champions league if he did sign so who knows.
 
ranxerox said:
this whole thing is leaving me a bit 'aggered.

article-0-02168C3D000005DC-427_306x423.jpg
 
sjk2008 said:
BBC Sport said he sported a new tattoo on his knuckles in last night's match which said "You'll Never Walk Alone".

That is utter bollocks.I watched sky yesterday,he was signing shirts outside the club in his car and there were no tats on either hand.(unless he has had it done yesterday)!!
 
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
sjk2008 said:
BBC Sport said he sported a new tattoo on his knuckles in last night's match which said "You'll Never Walk Alone".

That is utter bollocks.I watched sky yesterday,he was signing shirts outside the club in his car and there were no tats on either hand.(unless he has had it done yesterday)!!

<a class="postlink" href="http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-dirty-tackle/man-city-target-daniel-agger-just-got-ynwa-042157548--sow.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-di ... --sow.html</a>

Doesn't seem like 'utter bollocks' to me.
 
citytill1die84 said:
Liverpool could of named Agger in the squad last night expecting a reaction from him. Somebody said Agger wants a loyalty bonus but won't get it if he asks to leave. They could of been expecting Agger to refuse to play last night but he didn't.

So they make him cup tied risking a lower transfer fee and hopefully avoid the loyalty bonus for Agger? Well that wasnt succesful then.

Maybe they still hope we pay the same amount no matter he is cup tied or not. Would a joke, because his pricve should be lower is he is cup tied.

Still not one official thing about he is cup tied or not. According to rules he should be as long as Pool gets into EL groups.

Uefa makes the draw right now, Pool probably gets an easy opponent again.
 
sjk2008 said:
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
sjk2008 said:
BBC Sport said he sported a new tattoo on his knuckles in last night's match which said "You'll Never Walk Alone".

That is utter bollocks.I watched sky yesterday,he was signing shirts outside the club in his car and there were no tats on either hand.(unless he has had it done yesterday)!!

<a class="postlink" href="http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-dirty-tackle/man-city-target-daniel-agger-just-got-ynwa-042157548--sow.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-di ... --sow.html</a>

Doesn't seem like 'utter bollocks' to me.

Errrr yes it is...there was discussion on here the other day about that photo and it was agreed 100% that it had been photoshopped. It is bollocks!
 
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
sjk2008 said:
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
That is utter bollocks.I watched sky yesterday,he was signing shirts outside the club in his car and there were no tats on either hand.(unless he has had it done yesterday)!!

<a class="postlink" href="http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-dirty-tackle/man-city-target-daniel-agger-just-got-ynwa-042157548--sow.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-di ... --sow.html</a>

Doesn't seem like 'utter bollocks' to me.

Errrr yes it is...there was discussion on here the other day about that photo and it was agreed 100% that it had been photoshopped. It is bollocks!

IF that's the case, then fair enough.
 
sjk2008 said:
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
sjk2008 said:
<a class="postlink" href="http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-dirty-tackle/man-city-target-daniel-agger-just-got-ynwa-042157548--sow.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-di ... --sow.html</a>

Doesn't seem like 'utter bollocks' to me.

Errrr yes it is...there was discussion on here the other day about that photo and it was agreed 100% that it had been photoshopped. It is bollocks!

IF that's the case, then fair enough.
look at the lighter shade of skin around the W it looks so odd to me
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top