What on earth has shown you that Ings can put away as many chances as Kane?I’m just going to say it, I would take Danny ings over kane if it meant we got him £100 million cheaper!
he would put away just as many chance as kane and if it meant we get haaland next summer or Nunez then this deal would make a lot of sense
It might be a case of him being the only option though. The false nine works fine some matches, is absolutely hopeless in others, Jesus is not the answer up top so a new striker is imperative. If Ings is the only suitable striker available we'd have to try for himWhat on earth has shown you that Ings can put away as many chances as Kane?
Signing an injury prone 29yr old on big wages to a 3yr contract, just to try and get Haaland next year is something the rags would do. Not us.
I would fall through the floor if we signed him just because we haven't got Kane or Haaland. We will keep Jesus and Torres as our options.It might be a case of him being the only option though. The false nine works fine some matches, is absolutely hopeless in others, Jesus is not the answer up top so a new striker is imperative. If Ings is the only suitable striker available we'd have to try for him
Christ, it's Danny Ings, he'll cost £20-25m max to whoever he goes, even if they charge us more it'll be £30m or so. His injury record + 1 year left on contract is why. Can't see it to us though.If we can get him tor between 30-40m then go for it City. The city premium will be 60-80 though, so forget that
I would love him as a backupIf Jesus goes can see Ings as a Kane backup
Wouldn't be a bad 2nd striker at all I'd go with it.I would love him as a backup