David Coote

And this is what social media can do, be it true or not

View attachment 138025
We don’t lose many, so it stands to reason a ref that only recently became a top flight ref wouldn’t see us lose. Plus, he hasn’t had too many big City games.

We all know that statistics can be made to make almost any argument, but I’m not even sure what argument is being made here?

That City are perennial winners or that Liverpool have got a fair shake from him?!
 
Last edited:
Just accept it that the integrity of the game is at question here. It was a definite penalty. Frank Lampards interview about his 3 year old kid would have whistled for that penalty.
I am definitely a doubter now. Chris K was in the VAR panel. Doubts galore.
If Everton scored that penalty, then both Liverpool and Man City were tied on 63 points each after 27 games. Liverpool lost that league by a single point.
Wow. You still going.on about the Rodri handball?
How many years on is this now?

1. Was it hand ball? Yes.
2. Should it have been a penalty if so? Yes.
3. So why wasn't it handball and a penalty? Because Richarlason was given offside in the lead up to the move before Rodri handballed it.

Now please get over it and move on.
 
Wow. You still going.on about the Rodri handball?
How many years on is this now?

1. Was it hand ball? Yes.
2. Should it have been a penalty if so? Yes.
3. So why wasn't it handball and a penalty? Because Richarlason was given offside in the lead up to the move before Rodri handballed it.

Now please get over it and move on.
The weird thing is they have dug up the Rodri handball incident up because of what Coote said & added it to a very long list of reasons why they didnt win things but Coote wasnt involved in that game in any way?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.