David Silva

[BlueTG]

While I have always hated cliches one thing springs to mind, can a leopard change its spots?

The obvious answer is no, I say no but a leopard can bathe in mud to temporarily mask them, then when the rain season comes that mud is washed away and the leopard is laid bare; spots and all. Now while many thought we had a lion, the kind of beast that commands the respect of the entire plain, I initially thought we had a leopard. Alas I was tricked, but I believe the rain season has come and laid bare the reality. We have a leopard, and it certainly cannot change it's spots.

Now some will say a leopard is what we want; what we need. Elegance is guaranteed with style and panache in equal measure, and you also get a predator. But really, is leopard top predator? Of course not. While many fear it there is a select few who don't, and even more than that instill the kind of fear in the leopard that is reserved only for the lowliest of herbivores. Tell me this, if leopards are so formidable why do they need to climb trees?

To get off the plain where the true beasts rule supreme.

Now I am all for leopards, but people need to realise that if we really want to rule the plain we need lions, tigers, rhinos etc. Not lowly leopards.

??

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

So are you saying we should sign a leopard?

no, he says we have a leopard(Silva) but we need a lion(Messi or Ronaldo).

Unnecessary metaphors.

least they aren't being tortured by some long haired dudes with a couple of electric guitars and a drum set.

 

[The Future's Blue]

I'm frankly amazed that his thread exists. Never mind fucking leopard's, we've got fucking shit loads too many hyena's in here!

 

[MCFC BOB]

no, he says we have a leopard(Silva) but we need a lion(Messi or Ronaldo).

Unnecessary metaphors.

least they aren't being tortured by some long haired dudes with a couple of electric guitars and a drum set.

I don't follow.

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

Unnecessary metaphors.

least they aren't being tortured by some long haired dudes with a couple of electric guitars and a drum set.

I don't follow.

never mind Bob...

 

[King Geedorah]

While I have always hated cliches one thing springs to mind, can a leopard change its spots?

The obvious answer is no, I say no but a leopard can bathe in mud to temporarily mask them, then when the rain season comes that mud is washed away and the leopard is laid bare; spots and all. Now while many thought we had a lion, the kind of beast that commands the respect of the entire plain, I initially thought we had a leopard. Alas I was tricked, but I believe the rain season has come and laid bare the reality. We have a leopard, and it certainly cannot change it's spots.

Now some will say a leopard is what we want; what we need. Elegance is guaranteed with style and panache in equal measure, and you also get a predator. But really, is leopard top predator? Of course not. While many fear it there is a select few who don't, and even more than that instill the kind of fear in the leopard that is reserved only for the lowliest of herbivores. Tell me this, if leopards are so formidable why do they need to climb trees?

To get off the plain where the true beasts rule supreme.

Now I am all for leopards, but people need to realise that if we really want to rule the plain we need lions, tigers, rhinos etc. Not lowly leopards.

So are you saying we should sign a leopard?

no, he says we have a leopard(Silva) but we need a lion(Messi or Ronaldo).

Reverse anthropomorphism is more about the qualities of an animal, than the quality of the animal itself. Who am I to say a lion is inherently better than a leopard?

Of course in some respects the lion is superior, but in others a leopard reigns supreme. Could a lion survive in a jungle, probably not as well as a leopard. So no I'm not questioning Silva's quality out right, just as I would never question leopard quality out right.

What I mean is we need that out right dominance of the plain, we need the other animals to tremble in our presence. You could assemble 11 of the finest Buffalo known to man but would a single lion worry? Of course not. That's what I mean.

 

[Josh Blue]

So are you saying we should sign a leopard?

no, he says we have a leopard(Silva) but we need a lion(Messi or Ronaldo).

Reverse anthropomorphism is more about the qualities of an animal, than the quality of the animal itself. Who am I to say a lion is inherently better than a leopard?

Of course in some respects the lion is superior, but in others a leopard reigns supreme. Could a lion survive in a jungle, probably not as well as a leopard. So no I'm not questioning Silva's quality out right, just as I would never question leopard quality out right.

What I mean is we need that out right dominance of the plain, we need the other animals to tremble in our presence. You could assemble 11 of the finest Buffalo known to man but would a single lion worry? Of course not. That's what I mean.

Your fucked in the head bruv!

 

[Denis Law Back Heel]

He has been a little of the boil recently but I can understand why, with him coming out and saying he is feeling the pain of this ankle injury he has had in the past. I just see it as he needs a long rest, but at a crucial part of the season like this cant see him being left out for to many games

 

[ElanJo]

So are you saying we should sign a leopard?

no, he says we have a leopard(Silva) but we need a lion(Messi or Ronaldo).

Reverse anthropomorphism is more about the qualities of an animal, than the quality of the animal itself. Who am I to say a lion is inherently better than a leopard?

Of course in some respects the lion is superior, but in others a leopard reigns supreme. Could a lion survive in a jungle, probably not as well as a leopard. So no I'm not questioning Silva's quality out right, just as I would never question leopard quality out right.

What I mean is we need that out right dominance of the plain, we need the other animals to tremble in our presence. You could assemble 11 of the finest Buffalo known to man but would a single lion worry? Of course not. That's what I mean.

What are your thoughts on signing some sharks with laserbeams attached to their heads?

 

[MCFC BOB]

no, he says we have a leopard(Silva) but we need a lion(Messi or Ronaldo).

Reverse anthropomorphism is more about the qualities of an animal, than the quality of the animal itself. Who am I to say a lion is inherently better than a leopard?

Of course in some respects the lion is superior, but in others a leopard reigns supreme. Could a lion survive in a jungle, probably not as well as a leopard. So no I'm not questioning Silva's quality out right, just as I would never question leopard quality out right.

What I mean is we need that out right dominance of the plain, we need the other animals to tremble in our presence. You could assemble 11 of the finest Buffalo known to man but would a single lion worry? Of course not. That's what I mean.

What are your thoughts on signing some sharks with laserbeams attached to their heads?

He probably invented them.