When your argument fails I can understand you would appreciate it not being pointed out. 16 is very early to sort the sheep from the goats and of course the flock will reduce - the trick is to keep the good ones. That's my point and it's just my opinion - clearly not shared by you or the club. We'll see who is right in due course.
You're still not answering the question or getting the point. SOMEONE HAS TO BE RELEASED. Do you literally want them to just try and sign them all regardless of rules and legislation? Do you think someone else shouldn't have been offered a scholarship then? Who if so?
I get the rest about 16 being no age to judge a talent, totally totally get it. I also think he'll have a good career, and I hope he does, but I suspect all this group will do....but they have to choose someone over someone and he was the unlucky one. You can't always have your cake and eat it.