Discussion: Manuel Pellegrini 2015/16

[Blue Smarties]

Hands on heart how many Blues actually think that in a straight contest with any Manager of any leading Club that we expect Pellers to outdo them tactically.
I know I don't -so we just hope that the players can overcome what fucking twaddle he's told them to beat the opposition.

He's simply not the top tier manager we need mate. Even Spurs and Leicester wouldn't swap managers with us! He's a fraud who's dining on his first season when the fruits of Mancini's labour were still lying around. We've been poor for a very long time. He was saved by a finale to last season which was all down to the players who were pissed at being embarrassed by United. We called for his head last summer, the club should have delivered. Unfortunately we're being served more shit! The dinosaur does not learn. He's a stubborn fraud.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Pellegrini continued problem this season :
he got to the stage of bankruptcy , poverty that he no longer knows what he is doing ro he does not understands anything to do with!For example play against Aston Villa with 3 mid and then against Liverpool with 2 - the weakest two-mud , NANDo who fails in high pressure and the like Toure, who swear the whole world it does not work mid - and bench ed the most important two weapons for higher pressure and they fernandinao best players season and Delph and followed duality defensive disastrous between Demi and Mangala !!Now pelle strongly babbling and deliver his head to the ideas of others, and the reason is he does not know , understand any football tactics except the 442 and when it proved last year's fiasco for 442 and forced grabbing him - and not his own free will - to give them up, looked flops this year because he is not a programmed himself nor his team programmed on other plans, so continues to delirium and confusion

Your last three words sum up your post perfectly.

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

Your last three words sum up your post perfectly.

reads like someone trying to copy down a passage from google translate that's being shouted to them by their mate who's stood in the next valley.

 

[onceabluealways]

Wake up this morning to news that Sagna says he wasn't ready to play after the France attacks. Surely the manager should be speaking to the French players to judge their state of mind, I said at the match that I wouldn't have played any of our French players. Both were awful.

 

[Lee the Blue]

Keeps throwing in a daft team selection every few weeks, just to remind us how daft and stuborn he is. That shambles and humiliation - just as the Spurs drubbing that hes apparently forgotten - falls squarely at his door.

You can absorb defeats, but we weren't just beaten on Saturday, we were utterly humiliated and lucky to escape with a 4-1 defeat on our own patch against a team in the bottom half who had just lost at home to Palace and had no striker playing. Abysmal.

We have top class facilities, and have invested heavily in a high class playing staff. Its time we invested in a top class manager. Pellegrini is a jolly nice chap and all that but you cant have games like Saturday and the drubbing at Spurs 7 weeks ago. The fact that it was blindingly obvious 20 mins in that we were being slaughtered, yet he sat there and did nothing till half-time is quite frightening.

 

[Blue Smarties]

Wake up this morning to news that Sagna says he wasn't ready to play after the France attacks. Surely the manager should be speaking to the French players to judge their state of mind, I said at the match that I wouldn't have played any of our French players. Both were awful.

If that's true then Manuel must answer some questions. He got the job over Mancini because he is deemed a peoples person - he should know these things after a conversation.

 

[mancity1]

Wake up this morning to news that Sagna says he wasn't ready to play after the France attacks. Surely the manager should be speaking to the French players to judge their state of mind, I said at the match that I wouldn't have played any of our French players. Both were awful.

Unfortunately players always want to play and maybe they thought playing would be best to put the events into the background at least for 95 minutes.

It effects different players in different ways but if they were not switched on they should have honest enough to tell the manager irrespective of what they thought about missing out on an important game.

Neither should start on Wednesday for more than this reason however.

The whole day was a disaster and you reaaly hope its the last time we capitulate in a game this season.

Honestly having seen the game again Liverpool were not that good.

We were absolutely abysmal.

 

[paulchapo]

Here is a question.Did anyone look at that team sheet before the game and feel confident of getting a result? Or did many,as i did,look at it and think ''Oh shit no!! This has the potential to be a complete and utter disaster!'' So on to the more important question.If WE as supposed non expert football fans can see that,why can't a vastly experienced manager,who's job of work it is and being paid bloody good money to see it,fail to do so?

 

[blueinsa]

If that's true then Manuel must answer some questions. He got the job over Mancini because he is deemed a peoples person - he should know these things after a conversation.

He got the job because he is a proven top class football manager who has won silverware at 6 of the clubs he has managed, including a league and cup double with us.

Hate him by all means and want him sacked by all means, that's your prerogative but stop making up shit or just repeating rubbish you might have heard down the pub or off your mates ffs.

 

[Pablo ZZZ Peroni]

If that's true then Manuel must answer some questions. He got the job over Mancini because he is deemed a peoples person - he should know these things after a conversation.

Asked if he had been ready to play, Sagna replied: “Mentally I was. Physically I believe I was. But I wasn't. I tired quite quickly and didn't have as much power as I used to."

So from this we can deduce before the game Pelle shouldn't have played him? In the same way all the other French players for various clubs who played at the weekend shouldn't have either?