bluemoon98
Well-Known Member
someone go find Txiki and tell him majority want klopp ;)
Blue warrior said:Not speaking on your behalf, the club.blueparrot said:Blue warrior said:So we look like mugs when we do appoint him.
Speak for yourself
Blue warrior said:mancity dan said:City are never going to come out and say that Pellers is out and Klopp is in as this would destabilize us even more.
Some right wet sods on here.
So we look like mugs when we do appoint him.
blueparrot said:Blue warrior said:Not speaking on your behalf, the club.blueparrot said:Speak for yourself
Don't think you do.
dasblues said:Blue warrior said:mancity dan said:City are never going to come out and say that Pellers is out and Klopp is in as this would destabilize us even more.
Some right wet sods on here.
So we look like mugs when we do appoint him.
You need to look at the subtleties of the press release and highlight the words 'at this stage'
This hints at a degree of flexibilty with the stance that we have initally taken.
It dampens down the speculation while the current incumbant can get on with securing the 12 points needed from this clusterfuck of a season.
BlueDejong said:Rory Smith @RorySmithTimes
City's long-term aim is Pep, 2016. Klopp would mean scrapping that. Liverpool/Utd bedded in with their managers.
Fuck....
Would we heckers like!Blue warrior said:mancity dan said:City are never going to come out and say that Pellers is out and Klopp is in as this would destabilize us even more.
Some right wet sods on here.
So we look like mugs when we do appoint him.
Damocles said:BlueDejong said:Rory Smith @RorySmithTimes
City's long-term aim is Pep, 2016. Klopp would mean scrapping that. Liverpool/Utd bedded in with their managers.
Fuck....
There's no way we'd turn down a definite for a possible. Either we have Guardiola's signature somewhere or we're in for Klopp and briefing against it
Damocles said:BlueDejong said:Rory Smith @RorySmithTimes
City's long-term aim is Pep, 2016. Klopp would mean scrapping that. Liverpool/Utd bedded in with their managers.
Fuck....
There's no way we'd turn down a definite for a possible. Either we have Guardiola's signature somewhere or we're in for Klopp and briefing against it
Damocles said:BlueDejong said:Rory Smith @RorySmithTimes
City's long-term aim is Pep, 2016. Klopp would mean scrapping that. Liverpool/Utd bedded in with their managers.
Fuck....
There's no way we'd turn down a definite for a possible. Either we have Guardiola's signature somewhere or we're in for Klopp and briefing against it
Have you not been following football for long? The games littered with denials from clubs which then become reality. From players leaving, not leaving, signing contracts, not signing contracts to managers professing their love for their job one minute then gone the next.Blue warrior said:blueparrot said:Blue warrior said:Not speaking on your behalf, the club.
Don't think you do.
Ok mouth. If the club completely deny he is being considered then employ him it mugs them off as lying can u see this? Sometimes when a club denies things it's because it's true.
blueparrot said:dasblues said:Blue warrior said:So we look like mugs when we do appoint him.
You need to look at the subtleties of the press release and highlight the words 'at this stage'
This hints at a degree of flexibilty with the stance that we have initally taken.
It dampens down the speculation while the current incumbant can get on with securing the 12 points needed from this clusterfuck of a season.
I would agree, but as far as I can see there is no press release only the story on Sky which as I posted a couple of pages back said according to Sky SOURCES not City Sources.