Do you agree with Pep that this season we are not very good in the boxes?

Discussion in 'Bluemoon forum' started by Marvin, 21 Oct 2019.

  1. davyhulme blue

    davyhulme blue

    Joined:
    13 Dec 2010
    Messages:
    162
    Should of squared that ball to Kev
     
    BosnianBlue likes this.
  2. aguerooooo

    aguerooooo

    Joined:
    10 Jul 2012
    Messages:
    1,528
    Location:
    manchester
    Team supported:
    manchester CITY
    agree but only since the beginning of this campaign
     
  3. Tricky_Trev

    Tricky_Trev

    Joined:
    18 Jan 2009
    Messages:
    20,968
    Absolutely agree with Pep. The Palace game alone was a perfect example of it. It’s a game we should really have been 5-0 up in, but nearly drew 2-2.
     
  4. ninjamonkey

    ninjamonkey

    Joined:
    5 Jun 2009
    Messages:
    6,654
    Been saying it for ages, glad to see Pep finally catch up to me...

    In all seriousness, even though he does like to put emphasis elsewhere as a deflection technique when something isn’t great he’s spot on in this instance. The amount of clear chances we create and fail to take is staggering, you see the opposition create one or two chances per game and take them more often than not yet we will have 4/5 before we take any. Not only that, there’s just as large if not larger number of instances where we are in positions to create a clear cut chance and fail to do so for one reason or another.
     
  5. Marvin

    Marvin

    Joined:
    9 Jan 2006
    Messages:
    37,979
    We're already averaging over 3 goals a game. If the finishing is as poor as many think (including Pep) then we should be scoring 5 most games.

    It sounds odd, but then again I am seeing City miss a lot of chances. I think it's great that Pep is so demanding of his players, I just found it a little surprising that he was critical of our finishing. There have been games like Spurs at home where the finishing was obviously poor, but I think Pep is talking generally, and not referring to one or two bad games
     
    mikemcfc likes this.
  6. Marvin

    Marvin

    Joined:
    9 Jan 2006
    Messages:
    37,979
    What is the implication of this? Aguero is deficient?
     
  7. ninjamonkey

    ninjamonkey

    Joined:
    5 Jun 2009
    Messages:
    6,654
    It’s unexplainable and I think that’s why Pep mentions it so often. We should be scoring far more than we already do given We have some of the most clinical and ruthless attacking talents on the planet. Personally, I think it’s probably a bit of a psychological thing and possibly a bit of complacency mixed in too which is only natural after back to back leagues and domestic dominance. Our players know if they miss a clear chance we will likely have created another within 10 minutes and so less pressure on them to score whereas other sides who are creating far less have to be scoring as it could be the only chance they get all game
     
  8. BJL_City

    BJL_City

    Joined:
    13 Dec 2016
    Messages:
    8,750
    Location:
    GDPR
    I've gone to town on this tonight and built upon the analysis I did after the Spurs game, because I felt Shots on Target conversion rate was so important.

    I've often spoken about the magic 40% shots on target conversion rate threshold, which I came to after analysing our results against shots on target conversion rate for the past season and a bit. I've now gone back over all 187 games under Pep Guardiola to see if there are any trends.

    Cue exhibit A...

    [​IMG]

    This shows a variety of stats over the three and a bit seasons of Pep. What we notice is that in 13 games so far this season we are actually having more shots per game, more goals per game and a higher conversion rate and shots on target conversion rate, above that 40% threshold. So everything should be swimming right? Well no, as we'll see later. The first alarm bell is the win % is significantly down from 18/19 and 17/18, and this season the opponents are having more shots on target than before, and their conversion rates are higher too, particularly compared to last season, but we need to delve deeper.

    Exhibit B

    [​IMG]

    This shows how often we achieve different "Shots on target conversion rate" brackets and our results against these. You can see, quite obviously really, just how much of a difference a higher conversion rate is. in fact, we have only lost 4 games and drawn 3 out of 91 where we achieve a "shots on target conversion rate" of 40% or above, in fact the record stands as thus:

    Below 40%: Pld: 96, W: 52, D: 23, L: 21, Win %: 54.2%
    40% and above: Pld: 91, W: 84, D: 3, L: 4, Win %: 92.3%

    Why is this? Well naturally the better your conversion rate the more goals you score etc. but we'll explore this in more detail in Exhibit C. What you can also see for 19/20 is there is a split, in 5 games we have over 50% shots on target conversion rate, hence why we have recorded some big wins and this over 13 games has a big effect on our average conversion rate. However, we already have 7 games below 40% and 4 below 30%, and if you look at Exhibit D you'll see these are the games where we slip up.

    Exhibit C

    [​IMG]

    This shows all the stats from Exhibit A against the "Shots on Target Conversion Rate" brackets. There are several key points to note:

    • Our shots per game and shots on target per game are remarkably consistent across all brackets, demonstrating that we tend to create a consistent number of chances, so it's not so much the number of chances that is the issue, but the conversion rate.
    • Equally, the opposition's shots per game, shots on target per game and goals per game are all remarkably consistent, and their average conversion rate fluctuates between 20-35% but this doesn't correlate with our win %, again demonstrating that we get a spread of different opponents in each bracket so again the key to the results is our own conversion rate.
    • We can see how markedly the win % changes against the conversion rate. There is a huge shift in win % once we push over the 40% threshold, we still record a majority of wins between 20-40% largely because in many of those games we are wasteful, but so clearly dominant that we restrict the opponent and keep clean sheets. However, we are far less secure there because we score fewer goals and therefore the 1 or 2 chances the opposition take become so much more important.
    • As you can see, once we hit the 40% threshold we go over 3 goals per game, which correlates strongly with our win %, indicating that 3 is the "magic" target to hit in our games to all but guarantee a win. As we have seen this season 2 v Norwich and 2 v Spurs haven't been enough and 2 v Palace became a nervy game with Ederson needing to make a couple of excellent saves.
    So onto exhibit D

    [​IMG]

    This monster is every game played under Pep, ranked by Shots on Target conversion rate. You can see at the bottom of all the bad results, whilst up at the top we have the more memorable games. Some key findings:

    • We have had 100% conversion rate on 2 occasions, our opponents have had 17 such instances. Not surprising given we have a lot more chances, but it's still high.
    • Remarkably, in each of the 3 games we have dropped points in this season, the opposition have had 100% conversion rate. In each of those games, we had a conversion rate of under 30%.
    • The only times we have dropped points above 50% conversion rate are the 2-2 draw away to Arsenal where we had just 3 shots on target, and the 4-3 defeat at Anfield where despite scoring from 3 out of 4 shots on target our defensive frailties that day cost us as we conceded 4.
    I know a lot of it is self-explanatory but I think it shows just how important particular thresholds and levels of finishing are in determining our success this season. It is probably the most fundamental aspect and controllable variable we have to influence our results and there is a clear level beyond which we are near infallible. Thus, I think this really sums up that Pep is spot on in his assessment and that especially with Laporte out leaving us prone to the opposition having clearer chances on our goal and therefore a better conversion rate themselves in certain games, that we need to raise our game at the other end to compensate. Having Laporte and/or Kompany allows us to get away with conversion rates between 20-40% more often because we kept clean sheets and snuffed out chances, this season we simply can't afford to be because we don't have the protection.
     
  9. ws01

    ws01

    Joined:
    6 Nov 2011
    Messages:
    2,987
    We actually rank quite highly relative to other teams in chances converted. I can understand that it feels like we're poor, but that seems to be so due to the amount we create.

    As for the goals, the white knights will probably come in and defend him but you've gotta really look at Otamendi and see how much he's contributed to that. As soon as you take him out, we seem to shore up.
     
  10. mikemcfc

    mikemcfc

    Joined:
    2 Mar 2009
    Messages:
    1,203
    Team supported:
    CTID
    No, Pep loves him and is bringing him along slowly, see also Foden.
    agreed, Aguero should get his starts, top 3 striker in the world i'd say. pure class.
    but oh how fkn lucky we are to have Jesus, to be that mature where most 22 yr. olds would be making claims of discontent and demanding so much more. folks , he is still only 22 yrs old, and will be a legend here if we can keep him.
    with this;
    Pl 30 goals in 74 gms.
    FA Cup 5 in 6
    LC 5 in 9
    europe 8 in 16
    in Brazil as a teen 16 in 47
    Brazil national team 18 in 35
    honors;
    Palmeiras


    Manchester City


    [​IMG]
    Jesus celebrating with his Olympic gold medal in 2016
    Brazil U20


    Brazil U23

    Olympic Gold Medal: 2016
      • Brazil

    Copa América: 2019
      • Individual


     
    Last edited: 22 Oct 2019
    mccity likes this.

Share This Page