Do you like trains?

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by mat, 10 Feb 2019.

  1. Zubrman

    Zubrman

    Joined:
    25 Aug 2008
    Messages:
    3,607
    Location:
    The Sexagenarians Club
    Thanks for the info Mr Bergkamp.
     
  2. dennishasdoneit

    dennishasdoneit

    Joined:
    25 May 2008
    Messages:
    7,489
    Location:
    Football has eaten itself.
    Team supported:
    MCFC.
    Wish i had his foofball ability..what a player Dennis was ; )
     
  3. mat

    mat

    Joined:
    22 May 2004
    Messages:
    59,348
    Location:
    Land of Make Believe
    [​IMG]
     
    idahoblues likes this.
  4. gordondaviesmoustache

    gordondaviesmoustache

    Joined:
    19 Oct 2010
    Messages:
    57,801
    Location:
    Any borough in England and Wales
    Just a follow up on this. Was going to drive to Reading (due to the £120 cost of a ticket) and the night before, down the pub, a colleague told me to split the ticket (Brum-Leamington Spa-Banbury-Reading & back) which I did and it was fifty fucking quid. About 40% of the price of the original. Absolutely outrageous and surely you wouldn’t get such anomalies if re-nationalisation occurred.
     
    BrianW likes this.
  5. BlueMoonRisin'

    BlueMoonRisin'

    Joined:
    18 Aug 2009
    Messages:
    10,323
    Location:
    Somewhere in Little Britain.
    Team supported:
    You are Banned!... Reason - "rag".
    A knock on effect of Thatcherism.
     
  6. Blue Mist

    Blue Mist

    Joined:
    14 Aug 2005
    Messages:
    14,752
    No you wouldn't, you would pay £140. I have been on a nationalised railway system, it is not something I ever want to return to.
     
  7. gordondaviesmoustache

    gordondaviesmoustache

    Joined:
    19 Oct 2010
    Messages:
    57,801
    Location:
    Any borough in England and Wales
    I clearly wouldn't pay £140 as I've already indicated that £120 was enough to compel me to drive! :-)
     
  8. Blue Mist

    Blue Mist

    Joined:
    14 Aug 2005
    Messages:
    14,752
    I was focussing on your point about the anomaly in the pricing system wouldn't happen on a nationalised rail system. I was agreeing with you but making the point that it would be even dearer once a certain political party got its hands on it.
     
  9. gordondaviesmoustache

    gordondaviesmoustache

    Joined:
    19 Oct 2010
    Messages:
    57,801
    Location:
    Any borough in England and Wales
    Ok, well I disagree. I think price rises would be much harder to justify if the railway network’s ‘means of production’ were in public ownership.

    I also disagree about your analysis of British Rail (assuming that was what you were referring to). I think trains were ok under BR. I used to get the train every day as a kid, pretty much throughout the eighties, so I speak with some experience, albeit from a young person’s perspective. Lots of things didn’t work as well as they do now, thirty plus years ago. I think the railways run centrally, with today’s technology, could deliver an efficient service. Being publicly owned doesn’t have to mean inefficient - many public services are delivered efficiently; I see it every working day (although I accept there is much waste in the public sector).

    It’s ultimately down to the systems and the people. You need people who care about what they do

    I think we could definitely find some seriously brilliant people who love the railways to run it, and run it well.
     
    BrianW and mat like this.
  10. worsleyweb

    worsleyweb

    Joined:
    29 Sep 2009
    Messages:
    25,563
    Location:
    Manchester
    That was our train back from Cardiff today.
     

Share This Page