SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 88,114
Well looking at the results of the vote, yes.Does this gap really need to increase?
Well looking at the results of the vote, yes.Does this gap really need to increase?
Which is a shame, the gap will continue to increase and the big six will remain as it is unless a situation similar to our club happens which can cause disruptionWell looking at the results of the vote, yes.
I was only saying I didn't agree with paying money for higher places. No need to be a kn ob just because we're on the InternetYeah, name them, I’ll help though, the first four I checked didn’t (Scotland, France, Germany and Spain).
So I’m gonna go and call bullshit.
Most use a PL model of equal split for one part and split the remaining amount on league placing.
No need to make shit up to back up your point just because we are on the internet. And be grateful that we are. I’m even more vociferous in person.I was only saying I didn't agree with paying money for higher places. No need to be a kn ob just because we're on the Internet
I haven't got a clue what you're talking about so let's leave it there. Hope you get your issues sorted.No need to make shit up to back up your point just because we are on the internet. And be grateful that we are. I’m even more vociferous in person.
I think it does. With this increase its minimal compared to the big clubsIt is due to the fact they're entirely different sports with completely different circumstances. I still disagree with Ferrari getting more money than others for turning up much like I disagree with Williams silly historical payments despite the fact they're a joke at the moment.
There's a £73m gap from last year's revenue of the 6th highest income team (spurs) and the 7th highest team (Leicester)
Does this gap really need to increase?
Are these the same WBA and Huddersfield that took points off some off the top teams. That is why the prem is doing fine . Equal share The only teams who should get more are the ones who finish First.I think it does. With this increase its minimal compared to the big clubs
A. Fucking off and staring their own league
B. Negotiating their own rights for overseas. As someone said earlier , who wants to pay to see WBA or huddersfield? I think this solution rectified this issue for now
Are these the same WBA and Huddersfield that took points off some off the top teams. That is why the prem is doing fine . Equal share The only teams who should get more are the ones who finish First.
Christ, you obviously struggle with linear arguments.I haven't got a clue what you're talking about so let's leave it there. Hope you get your issues sorted.