shevtheblue
Well-Known Member
Absolutely not. I love City, but i also love football and this is bad for football.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Do you think we should support the top 6 plan to receive a higher share of PL income?
- Thread starter Fame Monster
- Start date
Metal Biker
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 21,328
- Team supported
- Manchester City (and McLaren F1)
Absolutely not.
Don't forget we were once in a not so lofty position and this sort of proposal would have seen us prevented from progressing. There are 20 teams that make the Premier League, not just 6.
Don't forget we were once in a not so lofty position and this sort of proposal would have seen us prevented from progressing. There are 20 teams that make the Premier League, not just 6.
talkativesprout
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Mar 2009
- Messages
- 10,294
No, I remember my rag mate going on about Super league bollox in the 90s. As repulsive to me now as it was back then.
BrianW
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Mar 2006
- Messages
- 5,936
- Team supported
- There's Only One City
No, nay, never. We should always oppose the sheer greed of the elite, even as part of the elite.
wagonman
Well-Known Member
No.
Anyone who thinks this is a good idea can't come to my birthday party (nor can Daily Ma*l readers, Trump supporters or Brexit backers.)
JJ
Anyone who thinks this is a good idea can't come to my birthday party (nor can Daily Ma*l readers, Trump supporters or Brexit backers.)
JJ
barryo
Well-Known Member
David Conn just tweeted
Premier League: The 'big 6' have won their battle for more ££International TV money; any increase on the current ££ no longer be shared out equally, but according to where clubs finish...
Premier League: The 'big 6' have won their battle for more ££International TV money; any increase on the current ££ no longer be shared out equally, but according to where clubs finish...
It's a change, and for me a change for the worse.Why are people against just a portion of the foreign TV money being handed out according to merit placing but perfectly happy with the domestic TV money being split that way?
I'd be more than happy with a more equal distribution of domestic TV money and champions league money as well.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,066
Looks like it a slight increase in the way revenue will be distributed from 2019/20 season onwards. Disappointing to see the financial gap getting bigger still.
Very sensible decision. No club is going to be financially worse off than at present.
Now they just need to get rid of FFP and allow other clubs to find owners that will invest.
GortonBlue62
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Nov 2015
- Messages
- 3,060
David Conn just tweeted
Premier League: The 'big 6' have won their battle for more ££International TV money; any increase on the current ££ no longer be shared out equally, but according to where clubs finish...
David Conn's opinions on economic matters are about as balanced as Yaya's on racism.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,066
The title should be changed to:
Do you support the idea of ‘a portion of foreign TV monies being paid on the basis of league placing in a somewhat similar manner as domestic TV monies’?
Do you support the idea of ‘a portion of foreign TV monies being paid on the basis of league placing in a somewhat similar manner as domestic TV monies’?