There is no legal jeopardy for misleading on TV. If there was Trump would be f*cked.I saw the interview and the interviewer after on MSNBC she highlighted quite a few differences between her FBI statement and TV interview.
WH transcripts have been proven to have changed/edited by someone since the meeting with Putin.
Kavanaugh surely lied under oath? Devils triangle and Boofing are not drinking games. I suppose its hard, probably impossible, to determine a persons understanding of a phrase but it appears to me that he has preferred to perjur himself than admit they are sexual in nature and are not breaking any laws.
I dont know, I just think the guy is a twat. Shame there's no law against that.
Very interesting. It wouldn't just be his nomination for supreme court that would be in the bin, surely he'd be removed from the judiciary as a whole if found to have perjured?https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/02/kav...x-misconduct-claim-before-it-went-public.html
If the above is true, then he DID lie under oath, and it's probably over.
Why?https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/02/kav...x-misconduct-claim-before-it-went-public.html
If the above is true, then he DID lie under oath, and it's probably over.
Berchem also writes that Kavanaugh "and/or" his friends "may have initiated an anticipatory narrative" as early as July to discredit Ramirez — months before Kavanaugh said he first became aware of the accusation.
A spokesperson for the Judiciary Committee, which voted last week along party lines to advance Kavanaugh's nomination to the full Senate, denied that anything in the text messages contradicted Kavanaugh's sworn statements.
Always is until the verdict.Why?
It's speculation.
If it's true it's not speculation, which is presumably why he prefixed his comment with "If the above is true"Why?
It's speculation.
If it's true it's not speculation, which is presumably why he prefixed his comment with "If the above is true"