Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wasn't going to post here for a while. But if people are going to start talking about breakdowns, then there is something I want to speak of. 'Breakdown' can sometimes be spoken of as weak in relation to a 'not breaking down' which involves rigidly holding on to structures (beliefs ways of thinking etc) so as to promote an image of strength. What if this isn't actually so true? That sometimes one can experience a 'breaking down within - yet one doesn't have to react to this in a way that, in extreme cases would lead to the hospital. Instead one can recognise that all that is happening is that one structure is being let go of that it may be replaces to another. It is just a natural part of change. And there is even
a suggestion that it is those that can move through this in smooth and balanced manner that will know a strength beyond that which can be known by clinging to rigid structures even if they claim to be superior to those that have known breakdown.
 
I had a breakdown once.

Ooops, no!

I'm still having one.

Detailing the ways in which trump is a Trump a major narcissistic twat inadvertantly shone a light on how much of a narcissistic twat I was.

I... just.... can't.... stand... myself.

Ugh.

But he's worse.
 
Summerbuzz said:
I had a breakdown once.

Ooops, no!

I'm still having one.

Detailing the ways in which trump is a Trump a major narcissistic twat inadvertantly shone a light on how much of a narcissistic twat I was.

I... just.... can't.... stand... myself.

Ugh.

But he's worse.
Click to expand...
Heh :) Come to the point that I feel like the trick is to allow lots of mini breakdowns that are easily digested, rather than wait and try and eat a huge
breakdown and end up with chronic indigestion. But saying that breakdowns have to be 'bad' and are a sign of weakness and so you have to be strong...that
kind of stuff leads to folks trying to kill themselves and/or ending up in institutions
 
Gelsons Dad said:
He's responding to Russia and China both developing medium range weapons which in Russia's case is in clear breach of the agreement.

Option 2 would be to do and say nothing.

I'm with Trump on this one.
Click to expand...

Nah, he's obviously planning a nuclear war with Russia.

That country that apparently he works for.

Wait a minute.
 
Damocles said:
Nah, he's obviously planning a nuclear war with Russia.

That country that apparently he works for.

Wait a minute.
Click to expand...

I suspect he's trying to appear "tough on Russia" before the midterms after appearing to be on his knees giving Putin a hummer a few months ago.

Of course he could soft-peddle and back-channel this, not yank himself out of the agreement, but it doesn't fit his style when can leverage it for political gain (or to backfill after losing political face).

It's also not quite fair to blame Obama for "ignoring" this when (a) he didn't and (b) the NATO report confirming the violation was released just recently. Once again, political gain, fingerpointing and his usual bullshit.

Having said all that, is he right to accuse them and criticize them? Do I believe him this time? Probably, because when it comes to American interests I trust Russia less than I trust him.

And Europeans should care given this is all about missiles that can hit you all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.