Donald Trump

[gordondaviesmoustache]

I imagine you have already, but have you done Jon Ronson's podcast/radio show Things Fell Apart?

Actually no, so thanks for the heads up. :-)

 

[Mr Kobayashi]

Because the majority of people are fucking idiots and the internet allows them to be idiots without sensible people there to point out how much shite they are talking. See Joe Rogan.

Is he doing it via ASMR?

 

[youngbob]

Actually no, so thanks for the heads up. :-)

It's more about the broader culture wars, but a lot of it is about people getting lost in social media rabbit holes and finding themselves becoming part of debates that's been raging for 40 years, but is now so, so much worse. All episodes about 30 mins and you've got lovely Jon's soothing lisp talking you through it all.

 

[Dax777]

Harris didn’t grow up rich. Walz clearly isn’t in the pocket of the rich and he was a VP candidate and governor of a fairly large state with a pretty big rural/urban divide. The majority of US voters didn’t care.

How is this an argument for Harris or Walz not being in the pocket of Billionaires? The claim was you need the money of the billionaires to run your campaign. That has absolutely no relationship with how they grew up.

 

[super_city_si]

So what do Democrats feed off of then? Why are you so one-sided? Your argument doesn’t make any sense.

We keep coming back to the same thing — if one side won’t get in the mud and voters ignore the mud that covers the mud-slinging candidate, what is the solution?

BTW — A cap on campaign donations makes it MORE likely the rich take over political roles because then they spend their OWN money.

Would have stopped Trump.

 

[mancity2012_eamo]

That link doesn't work for me and anyway this thread needs to chill out so can't we have a picture of Kobi instead, has he acquired any more beds in the last two weeks??

It was only a Monty Python quicky. . ‘We are all individuals’.

Just in from our afternoon constitutional.
His favourite bed at the moment. In front of the radiator.

Just to stay on topic. He hates Trump too.

 

[BlueMoonAcrossThePond]

It was only a Monty Python quicky. . ‘We are all individuals’.

Just in from our afternoon constitutional.
His favourite bed at the moment. In front of the radiator.

Just to stay on topic. He hates Trump too.View attachment 139271

Nice doggy!

You'll want to stay well away from Ohio. I hear they're eating dogs there... :-)

 

[BlueMoonAcrossThePond]

These two hate Trump as well.

 

[Username Required]

But what exactly was the point of law or differentiating feature that enabled the overturning of a precedent? And how, exactly, is the decision to allow states to ban and make criminal offences many forms of post partum care justified by reference to the constitution? A criticism that RvW was too wide hardly fulfils the requirement and one could equally conclude that this latest decision was too wide. The criticism that RvW was not woman centered is a very strange constitutional point and very damaging to doctors. There are two parties, at least, present at any medical procedure. She gives no reason why one party’s rights are subordinate. This decision has done nothing to stem the controversy which was essentially about the right to life of the unborn. I expect some states will use this decision in an attempt to justify a ban on IVF and contraception.
Incidently, calling the ‘Notorious RBG’ fascist is way off. She was notorious for being too liberal. This lecture was not, of course, part of the case. She appears to be in favour of the substantive decision in RvW, which rather makes my point for me.

I was joking about her being a sexist and a fascist.

 

[Dax777]

I was joking about her being a sexist and a fascist.

This has to be stated. Lol