If Kamala will accept a debate by a neutral party, I'm sure Trump will do it.
The problem is that Kamala will only do a stacked debate.
She was better than Trump in he last debate. But that's partly because she was being unfairly sided by the mods and her bar was outdoing Biden's performance. Which she easily scaled. That said, Trump was poor. There were so many easy gimme's he missed.
What was the lie? I could be wrong but I think he is right that she was never corrected or fact checked once and he was multiple times. Maybe not 9. Wouldn't that just be an exaggeration rather than a lie?
It is a ridiculous rewrite of reality to suggest Harris somehow had the debate stacked in her favor!
It was a “make or break” moment for her and she came prepared and ready to be who she is. The fact that your narrative is that it was stacked speaks to YOUR bias, not that of the moderators.
There were MULTIPLE times where Trump continued a point after the moderators were ready to move on, and they simply unmuted his mic so he could make the last point, get in the last jab, and try to leave a Trumpian final impression of the issue under discussion.
As I said on here while they were debating, even attempting to be an adult in a debate with Trump is to cede points to him. The number of times he got in the last word, when the moderators wanted to move on, was infuriating and did, indeed, tilt the field…albeit in his favor.
Trump’s biggest debate and rally problem is that he actually believes he’s some kind of “stream of consciousness” genius! He can clearly afford the most time and best assistance to prepare for a debate, but beyond the 5 or 6 talking points he has been told to repeat ad nauseum, his rhetoric is wall to wall grievance of his supposed mistreatment or lack of understanding of his genius. He is, to put it plainly, delusional.
Years of getting his own way, through the force of intimidation, backed by the money required to follow through with it, has created a bubble in which he lives. No-one can say “No” to him or they’re summarily dispensed with (see Cabinet members and lifetime National Security experts and Four Star Generals!).
He believes he’s the smartest man in every room he enters, when most people in the room already know he’s one of the dumbest, from the perspective of actual, functional knowledge of the substantive topics under discussion in high level meetings.
In Harris, on a nationally televised debate, it quickly became clear that not only was he completely out of his depth intellectually, but of the four people present on camera, he was, by leaps and bounds, not only the least prepared of the four, but least knowledgeable of the issues under discussion…facts be damned!
At this point, the support for, and endless excuses in support of, Trump is reflective of the lack of critical thought…or, to be fair, entirely selfish financial gain…of the individual providing that support. Of course, there’s also room for racism and misogyny in there, but let’s pretend that doesn’t exist in American politics or on this Forum, and just put it down to blind idiocy, which should be more palatable to both sides.
The mirror can only reflect what is placed in front of it. What is it saying of you?