Dzeko

joe mancini said:
pudge said:
joe mancini said:
Someone to blame bud,ie a whipping boy.
Yes, someone who is blamed for something.

And I fail to see what Dzeko is being blamed for?

By me nothing!.I.m on about the whingers /moaners who seem to think he,s not good enough.
Exactly there's a difference between criticising him and making him a scapegoat.

Which is my point.
 
I don't think anybody is saying they dislike Edin, I certainly don't. Nobody can deny his talent and what he's done for us, but at the same time nobody can deny that his style of play doesn't totally suit ours and for long spells last season he was ridiculously frustrating. If he stays, he'll probably give is the same; goals but a lot of waste & frustration. Balo & Kun can be frustrating, but Edin takes the piss with it.
 
According to SSN a bid of 22 million from AC Milan has been rejected, also reporting that City have put a valuation of 25 million. Of course this comes from SSN Sources so take it with a large pinch of salt.
 
mcfc-mark said:
Edin playing with his back to goal= bad.

Edin playing towards goal= good.

Over to you, Roberto.

This is basically what it's about, everyone misses the point.

For Wolfsburg = given service, latched onto everything = finisher

For City = back to goal 80% of the game, target man, supplying not scoring = non finisher
 
Freestyler said:
mcfc-mark said:
Edin playing with his back to goal= bad.

Edin playing towards goal= good.

Over to you, Roberto.

This is basically what it's about, everyone misses the point.

For Wolfsburg = given service, latched onto everything = finisher

For City = back to goal 80% of the game, target man, supplying not scoring = non finisher
It´s Mancin´s fault eh?
 
nehe11 said:
Freestyler said:
mcfc-mark said:
Edin playing with his back to goal= bad.

Edin playing towards goal= good.

Over to you, Roberto.

This is basically what it's about, everyone misses the point.

For Wolfsburg = given service, latched onto everything = finisher

For City = back to goal 80% of the game, target man, supplying not scoring = non finisher
It´s Mancin´s fault eh?

How can he drop Tevez/Aguero?

It's a headache, but a good headache to have.

Dzeko leading the line is better for him, more involved and plays better. See's less of the ball when Tevez and Aguero are both on the pitch.
 
chris63 said:
If Dzeko goes and we get RVP then either Tevez or Aguero will be dropped, cos RVP won't sit on the bench.
I don’t know, people are saying rotation. But has there ever been a team that has equal rotation with 4 strikers? I know tea, who rest their main strikers in the lesser games. But never seen 4 strikers get equal rotation. There’s always an order in team selection
 
Ireland_for_pm said:
Good player but doesn't suit our system and too inconsistent. Get rid I'd say.

And what should we do when other teams set up to nullify our system because they know we can't change to an aerial tactic?
 
DaveTheYid said:
Dzeko should join Tottenham If he wants to fulfill his ambitions.

i6koyc.gif
 
file this in the 'reading-too-much-into-it' column, either way:

Henry Winter ‏@henrywinter
Tevez off to a standing ovation. Excellent display and fine goal. Dzeko on after throwing tracksuit top to fans. 88. 3-2 to #mcfc
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top