Ed V Dave - 9pm on C4 & Sky News

[SWP's back]

I'll repeat this for you Fumble as you ignored it (which is ironic given your post above)

Ps you really think you could ever scare me away for a few days with your total lack of knowledge or debating skill?

You're having a laugh:

You see. What's happened here is a multiperson stawman orgy.

Poster a: the markets don't lie
Me: you don't know what you're talking about son
Poster c: enlighten us
Me: the markets have never been stronger
Poster d: I'll tell the people at the food banks
Chabal: something where he didn't understand the cyclical nature of investments
Poster d: something else

All ignoring the fact 'poster a' was clueless and that if the markets don't lie then the economy is well placed. Which was my point.

I've shit stained kecks that make more sense than you. You're a coward, whenever anyone posts a rebuttal that has you flummoxed, you disappear and then pop up after a while with the same old right wing bollocks.

Look, you haven't posted a rebuttal.

Here, this may help:

rebuttal
n. evidence introduced to counter, disprove or contradict the opposition's evidence or a presumption, or responsive legal argument.

Now, no where did you counter my statement that the markets have never been stronger.

You instead introduced a strawman, which is logical fallacy. To save you looking it up:

A straw man is a common reference argument and is an informal fallacy based on false representation of an opponent's argument.[1] To be successful, a straw man argument requires that the audience be ignorant or uninformed of the original argument.

The so-called typical "attacking a straw man" argument creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition by covertly replacing it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and then to refute or defeat that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the original proposition.[2][3]

Have another go.

 

[The perfect fumble]

I'll repeat this for you Fumble as you ignored it (which is ironic given your post above)

Ps you really think you could ever scare me away for a few days with your total lack of knowledge or debating skill?

You're having a laugh:

I've shit stained kecks that make more sense than you. You're a coward, whenever anyone posts a rebuttal that has you flummoxed, you disappear and then pop up after a while with the same old right wing bollocks.

Look, you haven't posted a rebuttal.

Here, this may help:

rebuttal
n. evidence introduced to counter, disprove or contradict the opposition's evidence or a presumption, or responsive legal argument.

Now, no where did you counter my statement that the markets have never been stronger.

You instead introduced a strawman, which is logical fallacy. To save you looking it up:

A straw man is a common reference argument and is an informal fallacy based on false representation of an opponent's argument.[1] To be successful, a straw man argument requires that the audience be ignorant or uninformed of the original argument.

The so-called typical "attacking a straw man" argument creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition by covertly replacing it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and then to refute or defeat that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the original proposition.[2][3]

Have another go.

Oh, I don't know, I've won the Oxford Inter-Varsity, among many other debating honours and won a scholorship to liberal arts colleges in the USA teaching debating skills.

 

[SWP's back]

I'll repeat this for you Fumble as you ignored it (which is ironic given your post above)

Ps you really think you could ever scare me away for a few days with your total lack of knowledge or debating skill?

You're having a laugh:

Look, you haven't posted a rebuttal.

Here, this may help:



Now, no where did you counter my statement that the markets have never been stronger.

You instead introduced a strawman, which is logical fallacy. To save you looking it up:



Have another go.

Oh, I don't know, I've won the Oxford Inter-Varsity, among many other debating honours and won a scholorship to liberal arts colleges in the USA teaching debating skills.

What went wrong then?

 

[whp.blue]

What an awful thought

The reason Labour has moved to the centre is that no one (and by no one I mean single digit percentages) wants a true left government, thankfully.

True. Our electorate haven't voted in anything remotely resembling a socialist government since 1976.

Even the relatively stupid British electorate have realized the Socialist Governments may sound good but they don't actually work in the real world. Every country that has tried has failed. Labour have also finally twigged and in a desperate attempt to grab power they have moved to the right mind you without that switch Blair would never had a single day as PM.

Milliband doesn't even have the charisma or personality of Blair so no matter how far right he goes he will never have a single day as PM.

 

[Rascal]

Even the relatively stupid British electorate have realized the Socialist Governments may sound good but they don't actually work in the real world. Every country that has tried has failed. .

Yes the 1945-51 Socialist government was such a failure the first Tory to try to break from the social concensus was Thatcher in 79.

You talk bollox lad, complete bollox.

 

[Bill]

nobody wants a Socialist governmant. not even the socialists.

 

[Len Rum]

nobody wants a Socialist governmant. not even the socialists.

Thus spoke Zarathustra.
What?

 

[TangerineSteve17]

nobody wants a Socialist governmant. not even the socialists.

Bring it on :)

 

[Paulpowersleftfoot]

I'll repeat this for you Fumble as you ignored it (which is ironic given your post above)

Ps you really think you could ever scare me away for a few days with your total lack of knowledge or debating skill?

You're having a laugh:

Look, you haven't posted a rebuttal.

Here, this may help:



Now, no where did you counter my statement that the markets have never been stronger.

You instead introduced a strawman, which is logical fallacy. To save you looking it up:



Have another go.

Oh, I don't know, I've won the Oxford Inter-Varsity, among many other debating honours and won a scholorship to liberal arts colleges in the USA teaching debating skills.

The perfect fumble wrote:

I've shit stained kecks that make more sense than you. You're a coward, whenever anyone posts a rebuttal that has you flummoxed, you disappear and then pop up after a while with the same old right wing bollocks.

You would've gone down a treat in the American liberal arts colleges with such fine debating style

 

[TangerineSteve17]

Oh, I don't know, I've won the Oxford Inter-Varsity, among many other debating honours and won a scholorship to liberal arts colleges in the USA teaching debating skills.

Ok. So you're a mass debater.

I looked at this for ages. Hours passed. Drone didn't do it, nobody did it. Seriously it had to be done.

No reflection on your views. Joke for joke's sake.