ANY1aBLUE said:
SWP's back said:
Not really no. Yaya, for example, came to play here, not to play for the shirt, but to increase his bank balance (as can be seen from his wage demands) and to link up with his brother. Whether that was City or anyone else mattered not one jot.
Now he has done ok for the side, without destroying morale has he not? I find your "I want them to be desperate to come to City or they can fuck off" to be somewhat simplistic and child like. We are a top club going up against other top clubs for one of the most sought after pllayers in the world. He could go to any of the clubs and be successful, as well he knows. I am just glad that your input is limited to posts on a forum rather than being anywhere fucking near a negotiation table where City is involved.
-- Sun May 20, 2012 10:53 am --
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Thanks for that. Wow. Cheered me up.
-- Sun May 20, 2012 10:55 am --
You really are thick aren't you. You stated that if we couldn't get Hazard there were plenty more other we could buy. Now there is no way we could purchase the 3 names above so it is of no fucking use is it.
You asked for an example of a 'more direct player' - nothing more,nothing less. Bale is more direct. You didnt ask for any other qualifications. Question answered.
Are you always so unreasonable? Please don't resort to personal insults to defend yourself, as it devalues your argument and makes you look a little silly.
I'm not unreasonable, I simply don't suffer fools gladly.
You're moving the goal posts like a pro I shall give you that. Now here goes, I'll use baby steps to try and make it simple for you. You stated there were many other players we could go for (I presume you mean to play in his position of winger/attacking midfield-forward, a similar role to Messi & Ronaldo), now the 3 names you see so happy about could not be purchased at this time, so it's hardly possible to count them as being "other players we could go for" is it.
Then you siggest Bale! And don't take it down to the semantics of "you simply said more direct not better". If I wanted the most direct player I could have just said Richard Dunne as he twats it up field every time.
My fault really for expecting you to follow a line of thought. I should have been more precise in the first instant and said "name me another player that we could possibly purchase this summer that would be as good or better than Hazard playing as a wide attacking forward who also has the ability to play in the centre behind the strikers". The answer is that there isn't one.
-- Sun May 20, 2012 11:11 am --
cookster said:
One of the last posts I read last night and one of the first today, SWP is calling someone thick.
God, you should be our manager as you have all the answers.
There are many thick people on here that can't follow a fairly simple line of logic.
There is no need to call me God though. Sir will suffice.