Re: Edin Dzeko legend
Also, I'm addressing Kalouk, it's not your job to move the goalposts.
Yet even with the movement of the goalpost I can say that the striker in question finished as top scorer for his club the year they won promotion to the Premier league, surely that means the "contributed to any meaningful victories"?
Not really, if it's all about goals then it doesn't matter who they are against as long as the striker is scoring, surely?noise said:pudge said:If it's simply just about goals then tell me this;kalouk said:Surely it is about goals. I don't see what the price of a footballer really brings to the argument, Michu was cheap does that make him a lesser footballer than Andy Carroll who was expensive? I still believe it is about what a player adds to our team and at the moment Dzeko is adding goals which are winning us games. It's the three points that count and as we know you don't get any more for how they were scored. I don't care if the goal is scored off one of our strikers arses as they tie their laces if it wins us 3 points.
Is 348 games, 145 goals and 18 assists good for a striker?
If so, how much would you reckon that striker would be worth for arguments sake?
It depends on who the goals are against. And if those goals contributed to any meaningful victories. Like for instance, winning PL or Bundesliga (or any other major league, Spain or Italy for instance).
Also, I'm addressing Kalouk, it's not your job to move the goalposts.
Yet even with the movement of the goalpost I can say that the striker in question finished as top scorer for his club the year they won promotion to the Premier league, surely that means the "contributed to any meaningful victories"?