En Route or On Route

Mostly use "on route" when speaking, "en route" if writing - probably a bit pompus if i am honest. Same as "en masse" or "tour de force" often quoted as appearing in the English language around mid 18th century when French aristocrats fled to London to escape the revolution.

We are in an English speaking country so should use on or in not en.
 
metalblue said:
Mostly use "on route" when speaking, "en route" if writing - probably a bit pompus if i am honest. Same as "en masse" or "tour de force" often quoted as appearing in the English language around mid 18th century when French aristocrats fled to London to escape the revolution.

We are in an English speaking country so should use on or in not en.
as en and on are pronounced the same it makes no odds when spoken but if you're going to use "on" you should just say on the way. On route is meaningless.
 
themadinventor said:
johnny on the spot said:
ono said:
Hmm this thread could be longer than originally anticipated.

It must be the latter. Three holes in one would just make for one giant hole.

No, three in one would make the hole giant.

Ok for clarity, three golfers at hole number one, hit a ball each, all three strokes go in the hole, have they had three holes in one or three hole in ones ? lol

The whole number is irrelevant. Given that its probably a par 3, a more accurate description might be 3 eagles at whole number 1.
 
Barcon said:
On route, because I'm not French.

On route is completely meaningless from an English language perspective.

The great thing about English is its ability to assimilate and adapt influences from other languages such as Latin, French and German.

The most annoying thing is the way that the Americans corrupt English for no useful purpose.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top