Epstein / Prince Andrew / Maxwell

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ts-giuffre-channel-4-dispatches-a9164566.html


Prince Andrew took part in an orgy with nine girls on disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein’s private island, one of their alleged victims has claimed.

Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who was pictured with the royal’s arm around her waist when she around 17 years old, made the allegation in US court documents.
Click to expand...


Ever get a feeling the Royal Family are playing us?

Wills v Harry buries this little documentary about Randy Andy.
 
117 M34 said:
As long as they were all of legal age and consenting then good on him!
Click to expand...
I think that's the sticking point, to be fair. This is a man who when he died was charged with sex trafficking, which suggests that at least some of the women (girls) at some of his parties were not consenting. And let's not forget that there's a different age of consent for having sex and paying for sex. So if one of these 17 year old girls was paid or otherwise rewarded for attending the party, then that might be a further issue. And it's very difficult to claim ignorance of these issues when the person whose sex party you're attending is a convicted paedophile.
 
mat said:
Ever get a feeling the Royal Family are playing us?
Click to expand...

They've been playing us for a long time. Why Andrew continued to meet with Epstein after he was convicted, is either poor judgement, or suspicious at the very least. Epstein, Maxwell, the Clinton's, Trump, Prince Andrew...

but: members of the royal family colluding with a pedophile isn't anything new. Charles was good friends with Peter Ball, a priest who was convicted of abuse - Charles regularly sent him 'gifts of money' and put him up in a house in the duchy free of charge while he got his life back together. And, oc, the royals' (particularly Philip, Charles and Diana) friendship with Savile raises some very serious alarm bells. If we're to believe that 'insiders' within the BBC, BBC execs etc etc knew about Savile and his abuse - as has been suggested, many, many times, and openly declared by many - then Prince Charles' security detail would be very aware of what he was up to: they would have vetted anyone and everyone who came into close contact with Charles to the #th degree. And if his security detail knew what Savile was up to, then you can bet that Charles did too. And that isn't to mention Savile's ties with the Yorkshire ripper and the murders around Leeds.

The Royals managed to distance themselves from any dirt on that front, so perhaps Andrew thought that he could do the same. Andrew forgets he's not indispensable.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.