Savile's ties with the ripper?They've been playing us for a long time. Why Andrew continued to meet with Epstein after he was convicted, is either poor judgement, or suspicious at the very least. Epstein, Maxwell, the Clinton's, Trump, Prince Andrew...
but: members of the royal family colluding with a pedophile isn't anything new. Charles was good friends with Peter Ball, a priest who was convicted of abuse - Charles regularly sent him 'gifts of money' and put him up in a house in the duchy free of charge while he got his life back together. And, oc, the royals' (particularly Philip, Charles and Diana) friendship with Savile raises some very serious alarm bells. If we're to believe that 'insiders' within the BBC, BBC execs etc etc knew about Savile and his abuse - as has been suggested, many, many times, and openly declared by many - then Prince Charles' security detail would be very aware of what he was up to: they would have vetted anyone and everyone who came into close contact with Charles to the #th degree. And if his security detail knew what Savile was up to, then you can bet that Charles did too. And that isn't to mention Savile's ties with the Yorkshire ripper and the murders around Leeds.
The Royals managed to distance themselves from any dirt on that front, so perhaps Andrew thought that he could do the same. Andrew forgets he's not indispensable.....
Epstein / Prince Andrew / Maxwell
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
Savile's ties with the ripper?
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Spot on re the security vetting anyone they have contact with.
Fame Monster
Well-Known Member
Make no mistake, if that was me or you being accused of having an orgy with underage girls and a convicted paedophile, the police would be smashing in our door faster than Andrew did with that girl on the doc.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 88,232
Were the girls that took part in the orgy underage? I’ve not watched the documentary so don’t know.
Fame Monster
Well-Known Member
Allegedly, yes. She said the girls looked under 18. And ironically, the orgy was in the U.S. Virgin Islands where the age of consent is 18.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 88,232
Still think it’s unlikely the UK police would knock one’s door down for shagging a few 17 year olds in the Virgin (wahey) Islands.
mancity2012_eamo
Well-Known Member
Watched most of it and have it recorded, but it was mentioned that on the private island there were girls as young as 14.
The elite classes think they are above scrutiny.
The whole thing was making me sick, watching it. Nauseous with contempt for these people.
There's a whole secret scene organised for these rich pricks and they prey on young poor females in particular.
A lot of people implicated from Trump to Andrew to Peter Mandleson, Epstein of course, some French dude (Trudeau, I think) who was investigated as long back as the 80's. Fergie, Maxwell's daughter. What is it with the ruling classes, do they get bored with the mundane and seek out more and more to exploit.
Up to their necks in it.
Bunch of privileged pricks, the lot of them.
Fame Monster
Well-Known Member
I suppose it depends on whether they were 17 or younger, and whether they were part of a sex trafficking operation. At the very least, they should be asking him questions as well as investigating whether Epstein and Maxwell were grooming in this country.