Epstein / Prince Andrew / Maxwell

[domalino]

Bloody Bluemoon, can’t even make a sarcastic comment without it’s resident robot replying.

Sarcasm doesn't really work if you just express a commonly voiced opinion on the forum.

 

[kaz7]

This is not true. Forcing abuse victims to get other people involved is a very common technique in grooming rings and Epstein had been using it for decades. None of the girls who did it have gotten in trouble because everyone recognises it's part of the abuse.

Finally someone gets it

 

[Tez Tosterone]

Andrew.

hands tied.

had no chance in court with a deposition that apparently would have lasted over 5 hours in the witness box had he not caved in.

 

[kaz7]

the sun

quote ?

Andrew has also pledged to "demonstrate his regret for his association with Epstein" by supporting the "fight against the evils of sex trafficking, and by supporting its victims."

what the fuck

By giving her charity millions

 

[mackenzie]

He cant prove he was at the pizza place or that he cant sweat , also the car crash newsnight interview , he has caved , what you are talking about is not relevant in a civil case

So why didn't she take it to court?

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Sarcasm doesn't really work if you just express a commonly voiced opinion on the forum.

Um, yes it can. See the Rags thread, the Scousers thread, all after match threads etc

Have you offered your services to the BBC? You could suggest the title of Omni-correspondent and all other correspondents could be fired as you have not only the knowledge of everything, you also have the judgment.

 

[kaz7]

So why didn't she take it to court?

You will have to ask her but settling is what they do in the states , this is not unusual at all

 

[kaz7]

 

[Nellies left peg]

By giving her charity millions

Where has he got millions from. He's on 270k a year. Us fucking taxpayers probably

 

[domalino]

So why didn't she take it to court?

You will have to ask her but settling is what they do in the states , this is not unusual at all

People generally settle when the amount of money you give them, or other terms of the settlement - ie admissions, apologies etc. - outweigh the likely benefit of winning in court.

If they went to court, the damage to Andrew would probably have been much greater, but the benefit to Giuffre and other victims isn't going to change that much.

Quoting David Allen Green, law contributing editor for the FT - "Almost all civil claims in England and America end in settlement".